1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stella [2.4K]
4 years ago
5

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court invoked which provisions of the constitution?

Social Studies
2 answers:
olasank [31]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The answer to this question: In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court invoked which provisions of the Constitution, would be: the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause.

Explanation:

The McCulloch vs. Maryland case, as a response to the financial crisis of 1819, established two landmarks, when the Supreme Court ruled first, that the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax the National Bank, as it was a federal institution, and therefore, the state did not have the power to interfere in a federal institution, especially when it came to taxing, and second, that the power of the federal government and its institutions superseded those of states. In this instance two provisions were invoked from the Constitution: The Necessary and Proper Clause and the Supremacy Clause, which curtail the rights of states to impose taxes on federal institutions, and also, that establish that the federal government reigns supreme over states.

Nina [5.8K]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court invoked the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause.

Explanation:

In the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, in 1819, the United States Supreme Court pronounced a landmark decision on federalism in the United States. The State of Maryland had attempted to interfere with the operation of a branch of the federal Second Bank of the United States by charging a tax on all banknotes issued by non-Maryland banks. The Supreme Court declared the law that impose the tax unconstitutional because it conflicted with Congress's implicit legislative powers based on the "necessary and proper" clause of Article 1 of the United States Constitution. The clause gives Congress the power to pass laws beyond the explicitly stated catalog of jurisdictions, as long as these laws are "necessary and proper" to implement the explicitly named legislative powers. The case-law on implicit competences has been incorporated into international law and other legal systems as an implied powers doctrine.

Since the United States Constitution precedes the laws of the states, states could not prevent or defend competent laws of Congress by their own legislation.

You might be interested in
Who in the world still uses democracy today?<br> Someone please help me
NISA [10]

Answer:

I think trump lol

Explanation:

I'm just playing around

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Look at the information in the box. 1. Andrew Jackson was elected President of the U.S.A. 2. 3. The population of white settlers
scoray [572]

Answer:

The correct answer is  Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act Gold was discovered on Cherokee land.

Explanation:

In the year 1829 , there was a discovery of gold on Cherokee land .

When this happened , there were whites who had interest on it thus led to their settlement along the boRder and flooded on to the land .

This led t other declaration of all treaties with the Indian nation null and void.

The gold was discovered on the  Carroll County, Georgia as reported by the macron telegraph in 1829.

4 0
3 years ago
The first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, protect individual freedoms
damaskus [11]

Answer: 14th Amendment

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
What is the BEST explanation as to why Israel produces so few barrels of oil
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

They have very little oil to drill and extract

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you believe that race and gender roles still have an impact on the daily lives of Americans in the present day
aksik [14]

Answer: Yes because you will always have to worry about your gender no matter what happens say if your a child and your going to the store you would think am i a boy or am i a girl and say your a girl you might want to buy girl stuff not boy stuff. Hope this helps you can report me if it dosen't

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a provision of the Magna Carta?
    10·2 answers
  • An endless sling is a sling in which loops are formed at each end of the sling body by doubling over the material and securing i
    14·1 answer
  • Regardless of a generation gap, on ___________ issues, parents and adolescents tend to be in synch, and children's worries mirro
    11·1 answer
  • The potential number of children that could be born if every woman of childbearing age bore all the children she possibly could
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the damaging effects that stereotyping and labelling can have on individuals.
    11·1 answer
  • Most States have some form of ____, which are levied on the earnings of individuals and corporations
    14·1 answer
  • Opinions on Israel vs Palestine?
    12·1 answer
  • What is economic specialization?
    8·2 answers
  • What is insinuated about being less judgmental through practicing mindfulness meditation?
    13·1 answer
  • the operation order (opord) that is promulgated by the commander of an assigned mission should/may include all of the following
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!