1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
3 years ago
14

Wilma is one of five equal members of Polar, LLC. This year, Polar generates $5 million in profits. The company reinvests $4 mil

lion into the company, leaving $1 million to be divided equally among the members. How are federal income taxes paid o
Business
1 answer:
bogdanovich [222]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c. Wilma (and each of the members) pays taxes on their $1 million share ($5 million divided by 5) of profits.

Explanation:

Data provided in the questions

Generated profits = $5 million

Reinvested amount into the company = $4 million

Out of which $1 million is to be divided equally

based on the above information, the federal income tax should be paid by 5 members of $1 million each

Hence, the option c is correct  

And all other options are wrong

You might be interested in
In 2010 the United States posted a current account deficit of -$471 billion. The bulk of the negative value came from: A. a good
Brut [27]

Answer:

A. a goods trade deficit

Explanation:

The current account represent the trade balance (export less import) plus

the net income (person receiving interest, rent or wages from aboard less person and companies paying foreingers) and

the direct payment. ( remittances from wroker to US)

As the US is one of the most open-economies in the world the mayority of this deficit comes from import of good and services from aboard.

Another factor, is that US company invest around the world thus, the net income should be positive.

And becuase the US economy is strong as opposite of Mexico or other Latin America countries, the average US employee abroard will not send their wages to support his family.

Thus, we should ensure the deficit comes from a negative trade deficit.

6 0
3 years ago
LO 7.1Which of the following is a finance budget?
sweet [91]

Answer:

cash budget                                  

Explanation:

A financial budget within budgeting refers to the long-period and short-period planning of the company's revenue and expenditure. Exact cash flow forecasts help the company achieve the goals in the correct way.

A financial budget is indeed a potent tool for achieving any enterprise's lengthy-term goals. Relevantly, it also helps to keep the stakeholders as well as other institution members up-to-date on the company's ability to function.

Thus, from the above we can conclude that cash budget can be termed as finance budget.

4 0
3 years ago
Was the loss of traditional manufacturing inevitable in the U.S. economy? 2) Can the United States hold on to its current manufa
Allisa [31]

Answer:

1. Financial analysts and business examiners would concur such occupation misfortunes were inescapable. U.S. organizations developed from a horticultural economy to the present assistance and innovation based economy.  

2. As the case noticed, this will be troublesome. Be that as it may, insofar as American specialists remain the most talented on the planet and business people keeps on enhancing with new advancements and items, U.S. assembling will endure.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Signal Company has operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense of $1,500,000. The company’s depreciation expense is
ANEK [815]

Answer:

A. Net income is $825,000; and Net cash flow is $1,225,000.

B. Net income is $750,000; and Net cash flow is $1,150,000.

C. Parts A net cash flow will equal part B net cash flow by deducting $75,000 difference, or Parts B net cash flow will equal part A net cash flow by addiing $75,000 difference.

Explanation:

The following are given:

Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense = $1,500,000

Depreciation expense = $400,000

Tax rate = 25%

We therefore proceed as follows:

A. If the company is 100% equity financed (zero debt), calculate its net income and net cash flow.

<u>Calculation of net income</u>

Income after depreciation but before tax = Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense - Depreciation expense = $1,500,000 - $400,000 = $1,100,000

Tax expense = Income after depreciation but before tax * Tax rate = $1,100,000 * 25% = $275,000

Net income = Income after depreciation but before tax - Tax expenses = $1,100,000 - $275,000 = $825,000

<u>Calculation of net cash flow</u>

Net cash flow = Net income + Depreciation expense = $825,000 - $400,000 = $1,225,000

B. If the company (instead) has $100,000 in annual interest expense, recalculate the net income and net cash flow.

<u>Calculation of net income</u>

Income after depreciation and interest expenses but before tax = Operating income (EBIT) before depreciation expense - Depreciation expense - Interest expense = $1,500,000 - $400,000 - $100,000 = $1,000,000

Tax expense = Income after depreciation and interest expense but before tax * Tax rate = $1,000,000 * 25% = $250,000

Net income = Income after depreciation and interest expense but before tax - Tax expenses = $1,000,000 - $250,000 = $750,000

<u>Calculation of net cash flow</u>

Net cash flow = Net income + Depreciation expenses = $750,000 + $400,000 = $1,150,000

C. Explain the difference in your answers to parts A & B – specifically, reconcile the change in net cash flow that occurred.

Difference in net income = Part A net income - Part B net income = $825,000 - $750,000 = $75,000

Difference in net cash flow = Part A net cash flow - Part B net cash flow = $1,225,000 - $1,150,000 = $75,000

Each of Part A net income and net cash flow is $75,000 greater than part B because part A is an 100% equity financed with the need to pay annual interest expense on debt of $100,000 like in Part B before calculating the Tax expense and the net income.

The $75,000 diffence is as a result of additional tax that Part A has to paid on $100,000. That is,

Additional tax expense in part A = Interest expense not paid in Part A * Tax rate = $100,000 * 25% = $25,000

Diffrenrence = Intererest expense not paid in part A - Additional tax expense = $100,000 - $25,000 = $75,000

For example, if there is no annual interest of $100,000 to be paid in part B, we can then reconcile by just addinf back the difference as follows:

Part B new net cash flow = Part B initial cash flow + Difference in net cash flow = $1,150,000 + $75,000 =  $1,225,000 = Part A net cash flow

Also, if annual interest expense has to be paid in part A as a result of being now financed by debt, we will just deduct the difference as follows:

Part A new net cash flow = Part A initial cash flow - Difference in net cash flow = $1,225,000 -  $75,000 =  $1,150,000 = Part B initial net cash flow.

5 0
2 years ago
Sherry is functionally blind and seems uninterested during class demonstrations or teacher-directed activities. what can you do
kow [346]
You could provide large print or braille materials for her.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an example of a positive incentive for consumers
    5·2 answers
  • On June 1, 2013 Oakcrest Company signed a three year $110000, note payable with 9% interest. Interest is due on June 1 of each y
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT? a. Suppose some of a publicly-traded firm's stockholders are not diversified; they
    10·1 answer
  • Brianna, a salesperson for Cosmetics Corporation, learns that Cosmetics will increase the dividend it pays to shareholders. Bria
    12·1 answer
  • Opportunity cost is __
    15·1 answer
  • Unemployment is studied as a part of​
    11·1 answer
  • Business sofware programs make it possible to
    14·1 answer
  • Western Airlines operates five flights daily between Chicago and Phoenix during the winter. One flight leaves Phoenix at 12:10 P
    10·1 answer
  • Yi Min started an engineering firm called Min Engineering. He began operations and completed seven transactions in May, which in
    13·1 answer
  • In what situations is top-down planning likely to be superior to bottom-up emergent strategy development
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!