Explanation:
In the scenario described by the question above, we saw that the main problems in the workplace begin with the hiring of Professor Richard, this is due to the fact that a Catholic school is based on values and dogmas that are religious symbols of tradition, respect and culture.
A religious dogma is one considered the fundamental and indisputable point of a belief.
Therefore, at the time of the job interview, Richard gave the impression that his beliefs were aligned with those of the school and the Catholic spirit, but nevertheless, he posts extensive social media where he criticizes and defends values contrary to those of the Catholic institution he works for. , which generated revolt in the parents of the students and culminated in their contractual termination.
In return, the school should establish clearer and more effective conduct policies for employees, especially in an institution based on specific values.
The school should better analyze Richard's professional conduct before terminating his contract, making it clear to him that, regardless of his individual positions, in the workplace he should act in accordance with the company's current rules and procedures.
Answer:
Each should be used as follows:
Weight of peppermints = X = 25 lb
Weight of Chocolates = Y = 15 lb
Explanation:
Suppose
Weight of peppermints = X
Weight of Chocolates = Y
So According to given condition
X + Y = 40 (Eq. 1)
1.2X + 2.4Y = 1.65*40
1.2X + 2.4Y = 66 (Eq. 2)
By multiplying (Eq. 1) with 1.2 we get
1.2X + 1.2Y = 48 (Eq. 3)
Now by subtracting (Eq. 2) from (Eq. 3)
(1.2X + 1.2Y) - (1.2X + 2.4Y) = 48 - 66
1.2X + 1.2Y - 1.2X - 2.4Y = -18
1.2X - 1.2X + 1.2Y - 2.4Y = -18 (Rearrange)
-1.2Y = -18
1.2Y = 18
Y = 18/1.2
Y = 15
By placing value of Y in (Eq. 1)
X + 15 = 40
X = 40 - 15
X = 25
<u>Check</u>
1.2X + 2.4Y = 66
1.2 (25) + 2.4 (15) = 66
66 = 66
Answer:
7%
Explanation:
It would grow by 7% each year which is the rate of return on stocks
Answer: C) noncompensatory rule
Explanation:
The non-compensatory rule is used to describe a situation where a person does not believe that the good traits of a product in one area will compensate for perceived bad traits in another area.
For Elton, the good trait is well known brand names and the bad trait is brand names that are not well known. Even if for the brand that is not well known, the price is lower, the discount is higher or the store is well known, these still will not be enough to compensate for the bad trait of not being well known.
Answer:
- Exrpress understanding and explain why his/her demand is not acceptable.
Explanation:
When dealing with a <em>customer</em>, and you consider he/she is not rigth, you should be able to express your point of view in a respectful way but clearly preserving your rights. That is <em>assertiveness</em>.
You must confront him/her in a constructively way: make it clear why the claim is not correct or fair, even how it affects the your or the company's right: you undersant him/her but he/she must understand you too.
You should prevent the situation from escalating to greater proportions but you should not give in to unfair demands that involve a loss for the company.
