Answer:
B. Make sure each main point is brief
Explanation:
Based on the answers provided within the question it can be said that answer that is not an effective principle for preparing main points is making sure each main point is brief. Main points need to be emphasized and thoroughly detailed as they are the most important aspects in a presentation. Only the subtopics may be made brief.
Answer:
issue guidelines for employer conduct in administering equal employment opportunity programs.
Explanation:
This act known as the The Equal Employment Opportunity Act was enacted to check discrimination and unfair treatment against minorities such as African Americans. This act has given the right to sue whenever any form of discrimination based on race, skin color, religious affiliation is found in the work place.
Therefore the correct answer is issue guidelines for employer conduct in administering equal employment opportunity programs.
Answer: $32.70
Explanation:
According to the dividend discount model, the value of the stock today is the present value of the dividends to be paid plus the present value of the value of the dividend from when the company starts maintaining a stable growth rate which in this question in year 2.
= (Year 1 Dividend / ( 1 + r)) + (Year 2 Dividend / ( 1 + r)²) + (value at year 2 / ( r - g))
Value at year 2 = Year 3 dividend / ( required return - growth rate)
= ( Year 2 dividend * (1 + g)) / ( required return - growth rate)
= (2.46* ( 1 + 0.039)) / ( 0.113 - 0.039)
= $34.54
Value today = (Year 1 Dividend / ( 1 + r)) + (Year 2 Dividend / ( 1 + r)²) + (value at year 2 / ( r - g))
= 3.15/1.113 + 2.46/1.113² + 34.54/1.113²
= 2.83 + 1.99 + 27.88
= $32.70
price per share of the company's stock is $53.28
Explanation:
Under dividend growth model a stock is overvalued or undervalued assuming that the firm’s expected dividends grow at a value g forever, which is subtracted from the required rate of return or k.
Therefore, the stable dividend growth model formula calculates the fair value of the stock as P =D1 / ( k – g ).
P= price per share
D1 = current dividend
k = required return
g = growth rate
P= $3.41 ÷ (11 % - 4.6% ) =( 3.41 ÷ 0.064 )= $53.28
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
