Answer:
When a company sells different securities together (this usually happens during mergers and acquisitions):
- and the price of all the securities is not certain, the incremental method will first allocate proceeds to the sale of securities whose price is actually certain. The remaining proceeds will be allocated to the securities whose price is uncertain. E.g. total sales $10 million, stocks worth $5 million were sold and bonds worth ? million were sold. The company will allocate $5 million to stocks and $5 million to bonds.
- and the price of all the securities is certain, the proportional method allocates the sales proceeds proportionally among the different securities sold. E.g. total sales $10 million, stocks worth $5 million were sold and bonds worth $3 million were sold. The company will allocate ($5/$8) x $10 million = $6.25 million to stocks and $3.75 to bonds.
Answer:
Productivity Growth = 6.1%
Explanation:
Productivity Growth = Current Productivity - Previous Productivity/ Previous Productivity
Productivity Growth = 35-33/33=2/33= 0.0606 or 0.061*100= 6.1%
Productivity Ratio = Output/ Input
Labor Productivity= No of Units/ No of Employees
A preferable approach to productivity measurement is to record multiple physical measures that capture the most important determinants of a company's productivity.
Answer:
Human resources planning is relevant to organizational productivity because it allows a company to maintain and better target the right talent for longevity. It also enables managers to better train and develop the skills needed in the workforce.
Explanation:
Human Resource planning is the foundation of a company's workforce talent. Employees are what make or break a company.
I'm a little confused on this question however, I'm 99% sure the answer is illusory promise because an illusory promise is one that does not hold any legal weight due to it possibility being a biased and non mutual agreement and it's just a verbal contract in the place of a paper contract.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon’s relationships with her employees are strained, but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
Explanation:
Austrian organizational psychologist Fred Fiedler (<em>1922-2017</em>) proposed in his Theory of Contingency that leaders only have one leadership style and that they cannot shape it according to the different situations they might be involved in. Instead, leaders must be located in a situation that matches their style.
Since Sharon's leadership style is <em>autocratic</em>, she is likely to manage herself better in adverse situations where the subordinates still follow her instructions.
