Answer:
how the secondary data were collected.
Explanation:
Secondary data refers to the data that is collected by other persons beside the researcher who actually use it. (in this context, it would be the data that is collected by other person than Marvin).
Sometimes, the collection method could influence the data given by the samples and will shaken up the overall conclusions.
I'll give you an example.
In market research, companies often conducts research to find out consumers' preference toward a certain product. This preference could be given by the people through either public survey and private survey. Most people tend to give a more truthful answer if the data is collected through private survey since answering in public survey makes the people fear a chance that they will be judged by others.
Answer:
D None of the above
Explanation:
Social class:
It is a class where a group of people lives in a society with no difference between the social-economic status of people. It can be described as where a group of people shared their SES and this group has been used in research and censused of a country. The word class has come in the 19th century before this word-class there was a present word like rank, order that categorizes the social status of a group of people.
Carl Marx, Max Weber, these were the sociologist who worked on the society. There is such type of class status:
Its not that we allow it it just happens and noone can say anything about it even though its wrong
Answer:
The lack of access to clean drinking water poses a serious health risk around the world, and funds must be
raised to help achieve universal access.
Explanation:
The other ones are more of hooks/reasoning.
I'd appreciate if you voted this as brainliest!
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
