C
hope this helps
stay safe
brainliest is appreciated
Answer:
wet
Explanation:Hope it helps :)
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
There are advantages as well as disadvantages of colonization of humans on planet Mars.
<h3>Compare the colonization of humans on Mars of both articles</h3>
Both the articles talk about the Mars. One article says that colonization of humans on Mars is very important and necessary while on the other hand, the other article says that the environment of Mars is not suitable for the living of humans. So one article opposed the colonization of humans on Mars whereas the other is agreed with the colonization of humans on Mars.
So we can conclude that there are advantages as well as disadvantages of colonization of humans on planet Mars.
Learn more about Mars here: brainly.com/question/644043
#SPJ1
Your first sentence should be a hook. Your second sentence should be your thesis statement and the rest should be what the body paragraphs should be about.
