Step-by-step explanation:
distribute the -2 to (x+1) you end up with -2x-2=8 (multiplication property). Add 2 to both sides to get rid of the -2 of the left (addition property). 8+2=10. -2x=10 divide the -2 to both sides. x=-5 (division property).
<span>No, because postulates are assumptions. Some true, some not. So it can't be used to prove it</span>
Answer:
2(1g + 5h)
(2 x g) + (2 x 5h)
4g + 10h
_______
2
I don't know the options so I just did 3 possible ways it could be equal
I will solve your system by substitution.<span><span>x=<span>−2</span></span>;<span>y=<span><span><span>23</span>x</span>+3</span></span></span>Step: Solve<span>x=<span>−2</span></span>for x:Step: Substitute<span>−2</span>forxin<span><span>y=<span><span><span>23</span>x</span>+3</span></span>:</span><span>y=<span><span><span>23</span>x</span>+3</span></span><span>y=<span><span><span>23</span><span>(<span>−2</span>)</span></span>+3</span></span><span>y=<span>53</span></span>(Simplify both sides of the equation)
Answer:<span><span>x=<span>−<span><span>2<span> and </span></span>y</span></span></span>=<span>5/3
<span>
so the answer is B (the second choice)
(Hope it helped ^_^)
</span></span></span>
In order to find which one is or isn't, you need to solve for the value of 'x'.
2x + 15 = 35
2x = 20
x = 10
Substitute x =10, into equation. If each side are not the same (i.e. 0=2), then that's the equation that is not equivalent,
Answer is B
Double check this. Chur! :)
Hope this makes sense.
