The Northwest Ordinance was an act of the Congress of the Confederation of the United States.
It passed July 13, 1787.
The Ordinance created the Northwest Territory, the first organized territory of the US.
It was considered one of the most important legislative acts of the Confederation Congress.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Control a heavily desired or needed supply/luxury that is only known to exist in 1 part of the world, and you have a monopoly on it, and you can control the price to your liking, and other countries can't do anything about it, so if they want it, they'll have to pay the price you set.
This is not a fair assessment because it is a generalization about the other presidents due to an event that happened a long time ago and that does not involve them.
The Vietnam War was a warlike confrontation that occurred in the territory of Vietnam in which two sides faced each other. On one side were the North Vietnamese who had a Communist ideology, while the South Vietnamese had a Capitalist ideology.
This confrontation involved several foreign countries such as the Soviet Union and the United States. In the case of the United States, many American citizens rejected the idea of involving the country in an alien confrontation because it had not affected American interests.
The president of the United States did not take into account citizen requests not to get involved in this confrontation and lied to be able to get involved in it. From that moment the credibility of the government is lower.
The credibility of the next government was also affected because now citizens believe that the rulers are lying. This conception is wrong and unfair because the management of all the presidents and public servants cannot be generalized due to the wrong action of one of them.
Therefore, I believe that it is not a fair evaluation that is expressed by the war veteran Karl Marlantes because he is generalizing about all the rulers because of what one of them has done.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/11375126?
Federal court has more power or trumps the state courts.<span />
There is no clear answer to this but I believe, as a former Social Studies teacher and third-year law student, that the best answer to this is judicial review.
Judicial Review exists based on the general principle that the Government has to follow the rules of the game, namely the Constitution, and that it is the Judicial branches duty to review the actions of the Executive and Legislative branches to see if they are following the rule of law.
