Answer:
If U.S. auto manufacturers cut the prices of their vehicles to sell a greater quantity, buyers may assume that the lower price implies a. a lower quality comparted to foreign manufactured vehicles.
Explanation:
The problem of quality over quantity is that the manufacturing of high-quality products requires more money and time, and this, of course, influences the final price, which makes them harder to sell, also making them less available. On the other hand, the manufacturing of low-quality products implies less money and time, a lower final price, and higher demand.
Answer: 4 per m2
<span>To find out the population density of a certain
species, you must divide the number of organisms living in that habitat over
how big the area is. In this case, because there are 20 mice in an ecosystem
that is 5 square-meters big, then there would be 4 mice in every square-meter.</span>
Answer:
Freedman" Bureau was very succesful because Freedmen’s Bureau fed millions of people, built hospitals and provided medical aid, negotiated labor contracts for ex-slaves and settled labor disputes. It also helped former slaves legalize marriages and locate lost relatives, and assisted black veterans.
Answer:
Counterbalancing
Explanation:
Order effects is known to be the area of order of treatments in the course of an experiment process. Simply put it this way, putting the treatments in a separate order will cause some changes to the results depending on the order of administration of the treatment just as in the case study.
Order effects could be due to probably anything such as fatigue (from one or two tests), practice (familiar with the testing environment boost performance) or varying Testing Conditions (from the testing environment such as heating, lighting, or ergonomics).
Counterbalancing, comes into play in times of all probable treatments being given in all probable orders can regulate for order effects.
Counterbalancing is a procedure used to solve order effects when employing a repetitive process design. With counterbalancing, the participant sample in our case study is grouped in fours using a within-subjects design with four levels to his independent variable. Conner has ¼ of the participants complete each level in ABCD order, a ¼ of participants in BCDA order, a ¼ of participants in CDAB order, and a ¼ of participants in DABC order.
The varying order effects would be compensated for by this procedure.
For within-subjects design, two major counterbalancing techniques would be used involving subject-by-subject counterbalancing, which regulates progressive error for every subject, and across-subjects counterbalancing that evenly spread progressive error over all subjects.
What map? put a picture or somthing
