I would assume you are trying to ask "what makes appeals to logic and ethics more successful?". In that case, it would be that they are founded in fact and have distinct argumentative points. This can be contrasted to appeals to emotion which may or may not be effective with the audience. As long as a logical argument is sound, and the audience is able to follow it, it will be more effective. Let me know if that doesn't answer your question.
Answer:
Living Life To Its Fullest
This is my philosophy of life and how to live it. Experience every moment, stay open minded, and cherish life for all that it is. - Pat, not me
Explanation:
Also sub to me, my channel is called Evimeró Academics the o is accented
Answer:
Simple terms:
The main character who is to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet is Romeo himself. There are many instances to where you can see that Romeo is to blame. To summarize If Romeo would have put more time into making the decisions that he made the tragedy might not have occurred.
Explanation:
Romeo is to blame is that he went uninvited to the Capulet party. If Romeo did not go to the party, Romeo would have never met Juliet, and Tybalt would never have known he was there. Also Romeo is to blame for him and Juliet’s death is that Romeo decides to avenge Mercutio’s death by killing Tybalt. Romeo should have been able to hold his anger against Tybalt and not kill him. Romeo and Juliet could have ran away together, but Romeo went and killed Tybalt which made him get banished. Lastly, Romeo can be blamed for killing himself at the end of the play. Romeo was not able to get over the fact that his love had died. Romeo should have been able to at least think about his decision longer to hopefully realize it was not the best decision.
