Answer:
The correct answer is: It may be useful if they are of similar size and objectives as the buyer's organization.
Explanation:
In this way a supplier`s reference could, in many cases, offer a mutual benefit for the companies, since they are sharing a lot of information and activities in a certain way. Once you offer a “favor” to someone else, in this case giving good references about someone else, in some other occasion could be the opposite; or it is also possible that between the companies some information of mutual benefit could be shared for commercial benefit or at the end to be able to satisfy completely the final customer.
I believe the answer is: precedent
In social setting, we can see a precedent in court ruling.
When a supreme court ruled a controversial case, the other courts would most likely use the ruling as a precedent to settle similar cases that might appear in the future.
I believe the answer is: <span>less accepting of the idea that humans are rational animals
He believes that human are animals that completely have to restraint themselves from irrational/animalistic instinct.
He doesn't buy the notion that humans are inherently good like what being preached by religious establishments, which make him regarded as the enemy of the church at that time</span>
Answer:
because they don't have knowledge to control birth rate and because of child marriage too
