1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grandymaker [24]
3 years ago
5

Why was the decision in Dred Scott v. Stanford so significant?

History
1 answer:
KIM [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Significance of Dred Scott v Sanford is that the decision was a landmark decision during the time, as it delcared that all African-American, regardless of freed or enslaved status, were not to be declared legal citizens of the United States. It also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. While it was intended to settle the slavery debate and tensions going on at the time, it instead deepened tensions between the abolitionist North and pro-slavery South that would eventually lead to Civil War. In contemporary times, Dred Scott is considered one of, if not the worst Supreme Court ruling in the Supreme Courts history.

Explanation:

Hope that helps :)

You might be interested in
Which of the following events occurred first, second, and third?
fenix001 [56]
I believe it's the first one!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify 1 geographic feature that may have impacted the development of Greece and explain how this geographic feature affected
yKpoI14uk [10]

Explanation:

The geography of the region helped to shape the government and culture of the ancient Greeks EXAMPLE-mountains ;seas and island

8 0
3 years ago
What did the North and Hupa Indians built along the Trinity and Klamath rivers and the Pacific Ocean
Andre45 [30]
Search hupa indians on google or your default browser
7 0
3 years ago
I need help like right now anyone please help
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

The explosion occurred outside the ship.

People on shore were cheering after the explosion.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1920s, how did most national leaders hope to go about avoiding war?
Anit [1.1K]
C would make sense because by not talking to other nations, there not a chance you would make war with one and another.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After France sold the Louisiana Territory to the United States, which two European countries were the remaining colonial powers
    8·2 answers
  • What is the answer for this question?
    8·1 answer
  • Which group took over the government of iraq in 1963 and placed saddam hussein in power in 1979?
    11·2 answers
  • The Silk Road was named retroactively, in the 19th century. What does "retroactive" mean?
    13·1 answer
  • What are some things that you can learn from the gullah culture
    6·1 answer
  • How is everybody today? Just wondering...
    12·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    12·1 answer
  • Review the detail from Twelfth Night, Act I.
    6·1 answer
  • During the Renaissance, why is it hard to call Luther a revolutionary?
    14·1 answer
  • Is there to much power in the executive branch?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!