1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
3 years ago
8

For my Criminology project, would it be easier to use the serial killer Keith Jesperson/The Happy Face Killer, or Carroll Cole?

(Which one has more information, including kills, death, their trial, how long they were on the run, and their childhood???)
Law
1 answer:
jekas [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Read your book for the answer

You might be interested in
Please someone help!
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

IT DONT SHOW KNOW QUESTION

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

no it can't be

Explanation:

because in your state they're illegal and by you trying to take them home from a state that they are legal in makes it illegal

6 0
3 years ago
LOOK AT THE PICTURE ATTACHED!!
storchak [24]

Answer:

40%9:14pm

Which of the following is correct?

Merry buys stocks for $3,000 and sells them

a year and a half later for $7,000.

Merry has to pay short-term capital

gains taxes on $3,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $4,000.

Merry has to pay long-term capital

gains taxes on $7,000.

CLOSE

7 0
3 years ago
Một người nam và một người nữ chỉ được công nhận quan hệ giữa vợ và chồng khi họ đi đăng ký kết hôn và được cấp giấy chứng nhận
Mkey [24]

Answer:

no idea, could be a though

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 ?.
Harlamova29_29 [7]

The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar.

<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>

The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs.

It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents.

Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What is nolo contendere in legal proceedings
    5·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HURRY!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What is the main difference between natural rights and classical republicanism
    15·1 answer
  • Que es teoría jurídica y como se divide
    7·1 answer
  • what are the consequences to a silent partner in a partnership when the partnership is unable to pay off debt​
    9·2 answers
  • Why is gerrymandering a problem for the House of Representatives but not the Senate? A. Members of the House are more influenced
    7·2 answers
  • What type of fertilization occurs when the female releases eggs into the water or attaches them to a plant or rock and the male
    15·2 answers
  • write a paragraph on your opinion of the correctional system. Do you feel it should be altered or changed?​
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following would NOT be a reason people create government?
    12·2 answers
  • The current copyright law allows an author to put their work into the public domain if they so choose and not profit from it
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!