What are you trying to do here?
Solve the graph, or make it appear as something else?
First, we're going to take one sec (x) out so that we get:
sec (x) (2sec (x) -1 -1) = 0
sec (x) (2sec (x) -2) = 0
Then we're going to separate the two to find the zeros of each because anything time 0 is zero.
sec(x) = 0
2sec (x) - 2 = 0
Now, let's simplify the second one as the first one is already.
Add 2 to both sides:
2sec (x) = 2
Divide by 3 on both sides:
sec (x) = 1
I forgot my unit circle, so you'd have to do that by yourself. Hopefully, I helped a bit though!
Answer:
The correct option is;
Simpson Paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon whereby particular trends are prevalent in small data portions but are not evident or an inverse trend is observe when the portions are joined together is known as Simpson's paradox.
Whereby the data for calculating the bating averages as found online are given as follows;
Season, Derek Jeter David Justice
1995, 12/48 = 0.250 104/411 ≈ 0.253
1996, 183/582 ≈ 0.314 45/140 ≈ 0.321
The overall hits to the overall bats ratio are;
, (183 + 12)/(582 + 48) ≈0.310 (104+45)/(411+140) = 0.27
Which shows that Derek Jeter's overall average was better than Justice's average
No because 3 is a whole number and 1/8 is not
