Historians often rely on both primary and secondary sources when supporting an argument, since it's important to use secondary sources to put the argument in context, and primary sources in order to make an original point.
The outcome of the Battle of that was fought in Syria in 740 was that the Byzantines won a major victory over the maya-ds.
<h3>Who fought in Syria 740?</h3>
In the 740, there was a war in Syria between the may Arab army and the Byzantine forces in the battle known as the Battle of which was fought at Akroinon near the modern Phrygia, on the western edge of the Anatolian plateau.
The battle resulted in a decisive Byzantine victory. this was due to the fact of the may Caliphate's troubles on other fronts and the internal instability before and after the Abbasid Revolt, this put an end to major Arab incursions into Anatolia for three decades.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Battle of Akroinon
brainly.com/question/7438505
#SPJ1
Answer:
Because they could not gain Naval or Air superiority over the English Channel, which is why Operation Sealion was eventually postponed. Nazi Germany had no intention of going to war with the British and was initially trying to create an Anglo-German alliance pre-war.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation: Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca introduced the wealth and power of Mali to the rest of the Mediterranean. ... The king had carried 30,000 pounds of gold, which signified the immense wealth in his empire. This created an impression on his acquaintances. Hope this helps... :D
