The answer to this question would be: risk taking
In this case, the nurse <span>finds that one of the prescribed drugs is redundant and notifies the primary healthcare provider. To recognize the drug as redundant the nurse should have read some source about that drug. The nurse notifies the primary health care in hope to changes the medication. It was a risk-taking attitude since that means the nurse willing to take the risk to implement the knowledge.</span>
For example salt in water ,salt would dissolve ,you won't be able to see it but if you taste it it would still be there
dissolve /disappear but still be there
The condensation stage is where water turns into vapor which forms into clouds and if we don't have condensation we won't have clouds and we won't have participation (rain). <span />
Answer:
There is no control group and variables were not addressed.
Explanation:
In the context, it is given that there is a dumping ground in a small town called Love Canal and harmful chemical waste of industries are dumped there. Lately, it is noticed that there were traces of the toxic substances on the walls of the schools and the hospitals. The hospitals also noticed that during the period of 1970 to 1980, there were increase in the number of the birth defects in the area. The people of the Love Canal has genetic abnormalities and the chemical waste is responsible for it.
Thus it can be concluded that there is a no such any control group in this case. The confounding variables like the comorbidities as well as the family history of the genetic defects were not addressed.
Answer:
taking a closer look at the natural world
Explanation:
using prior knowledge is basic common sense. so no.
requiring evidence and thinking logically is following a rule. so no.
following strict rules when using human test subjects. right off the bat, "strict rules" is an immediate no.
taking a closer look at the natural world. that's creative because they look for the answer around them.