Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

11

The results of a two-factor analysis of variance produce df = 2, 36 for the F-ratio for factor A and df = 2, 36 for the F-ratio

for factor B. What are the df values for the AxB interaction?
1, 36

2, 36

3, 36

4, 36

1 answer:

professor190 [17]3 years ago

4 0

3, 36 are the df values for the AxB interaction.

You might be interested in

Keenan scored 80 points on an exam that had a mean score of 77 points and a standard deviation of 4.9 points. Rachel scored 78 p

Artemon [7]

Answer:

Keenan's z-score was of 0.61.

Rachel's z-score was of 0.81.

Step-by-step explanation:

Z-score:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean $\mu$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ , the z-score of a measure X is given by:

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Keenan scored 80 points on an exam that had a mean score of 77 points and a standard deviation of 4.9 points.

This means that $X = 80, \mu = 77, \sigma = 4.9$

So

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

$Z = \frac{80 - 77}{4.9}$

$Z = 0.61$

Keenan's z-score was of 0.61.

Rachel scored 78 points on an exam that had a mean score of 75 points and a standard deviation of 3.7 points.

This means that $X = 78, \mu = 75, \sigma = 3.7$ . So

$Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$

$Z = \frac{75 - 78}{3.7}$

$Z = 0.81$

Rachel's z-score was of 0.81.

6 0

3 years ago

What is 69/16 in fraction simplest form

Tom [10]

It is 4 wholes 5/16. when you divide 69 by 16 it gives you 4 remainder 5

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Riley finished her 5k race in One-half hour. Darby finished the same race in Three-fifths hour. Which statement explains which g

Andrej [43]

Answer:

Riley did better than Darby because One-half < Three-fifths.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that explains which girl did better would be that

Riley did better than Darby because One-half < Three-fifths.

There are a total of 60 minutes in an hour, If we multiply each of these fractions by 60 minutes it would give us the exact number of minutes that each girl took to finish the race.

Riley: $\frac{1}{2}$ * 60 = 30 minutes

Darby: $\frac{3}{5}$ * 60 = 36 minutes

Therefore, we can see that it took Riley 6 minutes less than Darby to finish the race meaning that she had the better result.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the name of the song 50 points and brainliest.

solong [7]

Answer:

Butterflies

Step-by-step explanation:

Thanks

6 0

3 years ago

An international company has 27,200employees in one country. If this represents

Mariana [72]

23.2% of the total employees is 27,200

0.232x = 27,200
x = 27,200 / 0.232
x = 117,241 (thats rounded) <==

6 0

3 years ago