Order for a diagnosis of Antisocial personality disorder are diagnosis can only be made if the person is 18 years of age or older ,repeatedly breaking the law. repeatedly being deceitful.
For antisocial personality disorder following behavioral criteria apply: repeatedly violated the law. deceived many times. impulsive or unable to plan ahead.
<h3>How do psychologists test for antisocial personality disorder?</h3>
There is no blood test or imaging test to diagnose ASPD. A healthcare provider will review your medical history, perform a physical exam, and evaluate your symptoms. You can see a health care provider who specializes in mental health disorders.
<h3>What type of personality disorder is antisocial? </h3>
Antisocial personality disorder is a particularly severe type of personality disorder that is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. A person with antisocial personality disorder will often be manipulative, deceitful, reckless, and unconcerned with the feelings of others.
Learn more about personality disorder :
brainly.com/question/23432360
#SPJ4
In a procedure called random assignment, participants are placed in experimental conditions on the basis of chance, thus minimizing biases or preexisting differences in the groups.
Basically, the experimental condition is once the man of science manipulates the variable to assess its result on the variable. Below the experimental conditions, the participants receive experimental treatment whereas the participants within the control group don't receive any treatment.
Random assignment helps make sure that members of every group within the experiment area unit identical, which implies that the teams are doubtless a lot of representative of what's present within the larger population.
To learn more about Group here
brainly.com/question/15560909
#SPJ4
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
There are only two American Indians serving in he house at one time.
Is there no Options??????
