Answer:
17%
Explanation:
Margin of safety = (sales - sales at break-even point ) / sales × 100 = $ 800 000 - $ 664 000 / $ 800 000 × 100 = 17%
Answer:
this would cause total costs to Increase and the break-even quantity to Increase.
Explanation:
Total Cost is the Sum of All Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Cost of a product.
Advertising expense before adjustments are at $500. The cost of advertising does not vary with the sales quantities therefore this is a fixed cost.
Therefore an Increase in the advertising expense causes an increase in Total cost figure.
Break even quantity is a function of Fixed Costs divided by Contribution per unit.The break even quantity will definitely change. By increasing the fixed costs (<em>Advertising Expense</em>), the Break even quantity will increase.
it is likely that John chooses this oil company because of their good services
Answer:
$30,200
Explanation:
Calculation for the Cash received from dividends
Cash received from dividends = $31,300 − ($4,000 − $2,900)
Cash received from dividends =$31,300-$1,100
Cash received from dividends = $30,200
Therefore the Cash received from dividends will be $30,209
Answer:
Part 1. Additional spending on national park facilities & A tax cut is the answer.
Part 2. Expansionary
Explanation:
The Natural level of real GDP is also associated with the natural rate of unemployment. When the real gdp < natural real gdp, the economy is said to be in a recession. Thus unemplyment rate is> natural rate of unemployment.
Reason is as follows:
A tax cut, depends if its permanent or not (to see the difference between short and long run effects). However, for this scenario, a tax cut should give consumers more disposable income, which would increase consumption, thus increasing total output. The opposit effect would happen for a tax increase. Hence a tax cut is a policy that could bring gdp near natural GDP.
A reduction in government purchases would lower G, which would lower Y too. so all else equal, a reduction in government purchases wouldn't help increase output, rather it may fall instead. So this is not a solution for bringing actual gdp near natural GDP.
Additional spending on national park facilities:- Will increase income of someone or the other and thus would create extra demand . Thus it would give some consumers more disposable income, which would help them increase C, thus would be increasing total output. So this is can be a solution for bringing actual gdp near natural GDP.
