<em>Hey</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>
<em>Here</em><em>'s</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>:</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>highest</em><em>/</em><em>most</em><em> </em><em>populated </em><em>district </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>Rajasthan</em><em>.</em><em>T</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>population</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>6</em><em>6</em><em>2</em><em>6</em><em>1</em><em>7</em><em>8</em><em>.</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>also</em><em> </em><em>known</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>pink</em><em> </em><em>city</em><em>.</em>
<em>H</em><em>ope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
I believe the answer is A. hope that helped
At the point when a man relegates causes to another person's conduct and accept that the conduct is because of the circumstance that the individual gets himself/herself in, a(n) external attribution is made. In an outer, or situational attribution individuals derive that a man's conduct is expected to situational factors. While in inside attribution individuals gather that an occasion or a man's conduct is because of individual elements e.g: characteristics, capacities or sentiments.
For a long period of time, geneticists believed that one gene codes for one polypeptide. This hypothesis has been re-evaluated for two reasons. Firstly, some genes do not encode polypeptides, but functional RNA molecules. Secondly, due to the phenomenon of alternative splicing, some genes can encode several similar but not identical polypeptides. This phenomenon is present only in eukaryotes and it is based the fact that different parts of some genes can be used during gene expression.
I think ethics refers to the code of moral principles and values that govern behaviors with respect to what is right and wrong.