Answer:
cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance asserts that to reduce discomfort when external inducements are insufficient to justify our behavior, we justify our our behavior or actions to ourselves. It refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors which produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.
Yes, because there are many people who are learning or who know the language and live near, far or in the place they are speaking the language of.
Answer:
The answer is Kulaks
Explanation:
The term Kulak referred to peasants who owned more than 8 acres of land and were considered “hesitating allies” of the revolution. In the 1930s, with Joseph Stalin in control of the Soviet Union, kulaks were decimated; peasants who became wealthier from 1906 to 1914 thanks to the <em>Stolypin Reform</em> were targeted as kulaks, <u>but also anyone who withheld grain from the Bolsheviks</u>. From 1929 to 1932 the dekulakization consisted on the arrest, deportation and execution of millions of prosperous peasants in order to seize their lands as part of Stalin’s first five years plan on the attempt to create new policies centred on a rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture (aimed to integrate individual landholdings and labour into collectively-controlled and state-controlled farms).
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be the "Cognitive appraisal model".
Explanation:
- This model seems to be a sentimental concept, which specifies that somehow the interpretative opinion of an individual of a circumstance, occurrence and sometimes object defines or leads about his or her emotional attachment or reaction.
- When Stella learns with satisfaction that it may be somebody she recognized from either the classroom, she uses a model of cognitive appraisal.
Answer: At first, the disputing parties resist your offer to help create a win-win situation for both groups. They are each highly focused on their demands in the negotiation, otherwise known as their <u>target points</u>.
Explanation: The target point is the point at which a negotiator would like to conclude negotiations. It is his optimistic goal for a specific topic. The bargaining mix is the package of issues up for negotiation. Each part in the bargaining mix, can have its own starting, target and resistance point.
