The state is named after its capital, Tlaxcala, which was also the name of the pre-Columbian city and culture. The Tlaxcalans allied with Spain and defeated the Aztecs. Concessions from Spain allowed the territory to remain largely intact throughout 300 years of colonial rule.
The alliance of the Spaniards with the Tlaxcalans is his one of the most important events in the history of Mexico. This European alliance with the Totonac and Tlaxcalan Indians produced a formidable coalition that would eventually lead to the downfall and destruction of the entire Aztec Empire.
Tlaxcala has his three famous bullrings. The most popular is Plaza Jorge "El Ranchero" Aguilar, built in the 18th century in the center of Tlaxcala town. Today it is known for its farms and weaving. Tlaxcala has a long and rich history of cultural diversity.
Learn more about colonial rule here:
brainly.com/question/510352
#SPJ4
Olmecs are considered to be a mother culture because they are the ancestors of numerous other groups and civilizations that arose later in the Americas. They lived as early as 1500 B.C.
Answer:
c) Yes, because subjects in both experimental groups has slower reaction times than subjects in the control group.
Although Dr. Fitz's experiment is correct, he could improve it by placing men and women in the experimental and control groups.
Explanation:
The control group in an experiment, is the group that does not receive the treatment that is being tested in that study. Therefore, this group must present different results from the experimental groups that received the treatment that is being tested.
In the experiment shown above, the control group is formed by the ladies who did not receive any dose of alcohol and therefore had a faster reaction time than the individuals who formed the experimental groups (who received alcoholic drinks)
To make the experiment more accurate, Dr. Fitz should have formed all groups with men and women, since he could show whether the effect of alcohol is the same or different in relation to gender.
Answer:
Pretext stop
Explanation:
In Whren v. United States (1996), the Supreme Court affirmed that officers could stop vehicles to allay any suspicions even though they have no evidence of criminal behavior. This type of stop is referred to as a pretext stop, a pretext stop involves a police officer stopping a driver for a traffic violation, minor or otherwise, to allow the officer to then investigate a separate and unrelated suspected criminal offense. According to Whren v. United States (1996), the Supreme Court affirmed that officers could stop vehicles to allay any suspicions even though they have no evidence of criminal behavior that is police officers can stop any vehicle to put at rest any suspicions even though the driver has not committed any crime.
How they made hunting spears and hunting for food.
