Answer:
The correct answer is c) pollution should be eliminated as long as the benefit from the cleanup exceeds the opportunity costs.
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is presented in situations where there are two or more good options, so the company must choose the option with more benefits leaving the second one that is known as the opportunity cost. The opportunity cost must have lower profits than the option selected.
For example, in the case of the pollution of a lake, the economist concluded that the elimination of pollution should be chosen if the benefit is more significant than the second-best option.
<em></em>
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Noise
Explanation:
Communication represents the means of passing information from the sender through an appropriate channel or medium to the receiver. An effective communication is the ability to adequately transmit the intentions of the sender to be adequately received by the receiver.
Noise is anything that has the ability to disrupt the adequate flow of information from the sender to the receiver. Noise can affect any of the following: Sender, Message, Transmission Channel and the receiver.
Communication Noise in the context of the question is described as any influence on communication that affects or distorts the right interpretation of the message a sender is transmitting to a receiver.
In the context of the question, the noise is indicated in the error of printed price. Instead of #2.99, the interpretation for the consumers is $29.99. The consumers will therefore, consider the cookies to be too expensive. This is noise in the message as a result of an error in the transmission channel.
<span>It's important that you develop effective strategies for managing your time to ... Other skills involved include prioritising - focusing on urgent and important tasks ... could simply be to use your diary to write down the things you need to do, including .... your time more efficiently, and know some techniques to allow you to do this.</span><span>
</span>
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
