Answer: False
Explanation:
Classification shifting is a method used whereby the core earnings are manipulated by misclassifying the items in the income statement.
One way that managers make use of classification shifting is by reporting the operating expenses for the business as nonoperating expenses. This is usually done in order to inflate the operating income.
The statement in the question is false as classification shifting by managers doesn't lead to under-reporting of total expenses and over-statement of bottom-line net income rather it lead to over reporting.
Answer:
The company paid $278,031
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A company bought a parcel of land twenty years ago. The land is currently worth $575,000. The yearly appreciation rate has been 3.7%.
<u>To calculate the past value of the land, we need to use the following formula:</u>
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= present value (20 years ago)
n= 20
FV= 575,000
i= 0.037
PV= 575,000 / (1.037^20)
PV= $278,031
Checks written in November $9,750
Less: Checks paid by bank in November $8,800
Checks outstanding at the end of November $950
Add: Checks written in December $11,762
Less: Checks paid by bank in December 10,889
Checks outstanding at the end of December $1,823
hope this helps!
- a random freshman
Answer:
The correct answer is: bribery.
Explanation:
Bribery involves an illegal activity where a reward is offered from one party to another(s) in order to provoke certain favorable behavior. Normally, the bribes are offered to public officials or high range executives to avoid legal responsibilities, or undesired laws or to change the payee point of view on a certain matter being discussed where substantial profits can be obtained.
Answer:
d. the country would rank low on the accounting values of conservatism
Explanation:
Gray's accounting framework postulates that the 4 accounting values of professionalism, conservatism, secrecy, and uniformity can be used to predict differences in accounting systems internationally.
Uncertainty avoidance is the degree to which cultures tolerate unpredictability.
Counties with high uncertainty avoidance are more conservative for example Japan.
While countries that have low uncertainty avoidance are less conservative. They are flexible to change and more willing to take risks.