Answer:
The bullwhip effect happens when retailers or other members of the supply chain overestimate a sudden increase in demand, and this causes a chain reaction in all the other participants of the supply chain that start requesting higher quantities of goods or materials for production. E.g. the fidget spinner was a very popular fad and its producers probably didn't anticipate how large the demand would be. Once the product became extremely popular, everyone wanted to sell fidget spinners. This caused an increase in the order quantities of all the supply chain. Once the fad faded out, all this momentum stopped and many stores, distributors, wholesalers, and even factories were left with huge unsold stocks of fidget spinners.
When the supply chain is well coordinated, there is little chance for some retailers or distributors to over react and want more product just in case. If your supply is guaranteed, then it would take some extraordinary increase in demand to make you want to increase your purchase orders. But if your supply chain is not well coordinated, you might fear that you will lose a lot of sales and other competitors will make them. Then you get anxious and start ordering large quantities.
Answer:
Courts Distributors and Eastinghouse Corporation
Dispute over Contract Price
The two parties have a legal contract. The contract was established when Courts requested Eastinghouse to send the refrigerators and bill later.
The exact price for the contract is in dispute. This dispute can be resolved between the parties. Reference to the market price will help resolve the dispute, otherwise, the parties may seek alternative dispute resolutions, like litigation, mediation, or arbitration.
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Eastinghouse's invoice price for the refrigerators = $140,000
Courts' adopted market price = $120,000
b) Since Courts' reference to the price is with regard to the wholesale market price, it may be that Eastinghouse quoted the retail price instead. Since Courts is a distributor, it has the right to be charged a wholesaler's price and not a retailer's. Therefore, we can conclude that after due reference to the prevailing market price of similar refrigerators, the two parties may agree to a price of $120,000 or a little higher.
The correct answer to this statement is true. It is because a market segment's purpose is to have a group in which shares the same characteristics or goals because of marketing purpose. It could be seen in the scenario above in how they share the same characteristic in using the internet.
Answer: Labor
Explanation:
As a result of capital investments flowing, the labor in both the high wage countries and the low wage peripheral regions will shift due to interactions between the two labor systems.
The lower wage peripheral regions for instance, will see a rise in wages paid to their workers on account of the higher capital investment and people from these areas will move to the higher wage countries where they will be paid less which would reduce the wages paid in these higher wage countries.
Answer:
b) If auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Explanation:
Under the liability provisions of section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, auditors may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the registration statement. Under section 11, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k (1988), provides investors with the ability to hold issuers and others liable for any damage incurred and caused by false statements of fact or even material omissions of fact within registration statements as at when effective.
The Securities Act of 1933 was used to regulate the stock market as the first federal legislation. With this act, power was given to the federal government and taken away from the state governments.
Hence, the Securities Act of 1933 is used to protect investors from frauds by creating a set of standard rules.
In conclusion, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence in their services and responsibilities.
