Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
Answer:
Letter of Credit is the correct answer.
Explanation:
D. They are skills that employers in all lines of work are looking for.
The answer is geodemographic segmentation. This is a multivariate measurable characterization strategy for finding whether the people of a populace fall into various gatherings by making quantitative examinations of numerous attributes with the presumption that the distinctions inside any gathering ought to be not as much as the contrasts between gatherings.
Answer:
$2.73
Explanation:
<em>Diluted Earnings Per Share = Earnings Attributed to Common Stockholders ÷ Weighted Average Number of Common Stockholders Outstanding</em>
where,
Earnings Attributed to Common Stockholders = $420,000
and
Weighted Average Number of Common Stockholders Outstanding = 110,000 + (11,000 x 4) = 154,000
therefore,
Diluted Earnings Per Share = $420,000 ÷ 154,000 = $2.73
Conclusion
Rudyard's diluted EPS is $2.73
