Answer:
$75
Explanation:
$5 to $6.5 is a 1.3% increase and if the investor bought 50 shares of $5 he bought a total of $250 worth of stock. If you multiply the $250 by 1.3% it will be $325. But the question asks for the capital gain so you would subtract $325 and $250 which is $75.
Answer:
The answer is: A) Mary Jane has a comparative advantage in law so she should specialize in law and hire a carpenter to make her cabinets.
Explanation:
Mary Jane has a comparative advantage by working as a lawyer over working as a carpenter. As a lawyer she can earn $150 an hour.
Considering that Mary Jane is 3 times as fast as a good carpenter, her work as a carpenter could be valued as the combined work of three carpenters. But even three carpenters earn less than a lawyer; $60 an hour ($20 an hour per carpenter times 3 carpenters).
So Mary Jane definitely should work as a lawyer and hire a carpenter or even three carpenters to build her cabinets.
Answer:
disruptive
Explanation:
The term that is being described is known as a disruptive innovation. In the context of business theory, this term refers to an innovation that creates an entirely new market and value network which ultimately disrupts the old market and value network, while at the same time taking over market-leading firms, products, and alliances. One example of this are Smartphones which disrupted laptops as the primary way consumers use the internet in today's world.
Answer: increase by $80 million, and the maximum money-lending potential of the commercial banking system will increase by $400 million
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the money multiplier will be calculated thus:
Money multiplier = 1/Required reserve ratio
where,
Required reserve ratio = 20%
Money Multiplier will now be:
= 1/0.20
= 5
Therefore, the maximum money-lending potential will be:
= $80 million × 5
= $400 million
Therefore, the money supply will by $80 million, and the maximum money-lending potential of the commercial banking system will increase by $400 million
Answer and Explanation:
The calculation of the adjusted price that could use for these two comps in a CMA is given below:
For Comp property A, the value of the garage should be
= $452,500 + $4,500
= $457,000
And, for comp property B, the value of the pool should be
= $446,000 + $5,000
= $451,000
In this way, it should be considered
