Answer:
FOUR types of visual aids are, but not limited to, physical samples, models, handouts, pictures, videos.
Answer:
223,250 shares
Explanation:
proceeds from the exercise of options
= 26000 × 7 = 182,000
used to repurchase common stock at market price
182,000 ÷ 8 = 22,750
shares outstanding march 31, 2021
220,000
shares to be used in cal diluted EPS;
(26,000 - 22750) + 220,000 223,250
No. of Shares for computing Diluted Earning per share = 223,250 shares
Answer:
firms anticipate rival firms' decisions when they make their own decisions.
Explanation:
Game theory assumes that firms anticipate rival firms' decisions when they make their own decisions. It is very important and necessary for understanding firms operating in an oligopolistic market.
An oligopoly can be defined as a market structure comprising of a small number of firms (sellers) offering identical or similar products, wherein none can limit the significant influence of others.
Hence, it is a market structure that is distinguished by several characteristics, one of which is either similar or identical products and dominance by few firms.
This ultimately implies that, under the game theory, when firms makes a decision about their business, it is expected that they consider how the other firms would react to such decisions.
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
