The theory that social arrangements typically benefit some groups at the expense of others is called

1 answer:

4 0

The theory that social arrangements typically benefit some groups at the expense of others is called Conflict theory

Explanation:

This theory was initiated by Karl Marx who stated the consequences that the society faced was based on the conflicts between the classes. This theory gives the competition between the different classes and the struggle faced by the groups.

Thus conflicts leads to one group dominating over the other groups. In the society some social arrangements are made for one group and the other groups are also benefited from these. This is one major advantage of Conflict theory

You might be interested in

Which event would most likely be described in a gospel?

Snowcat [4.5K]

<span>Jesus' preaching about the kingdom of God</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Which physical geographic feature attracted factories?

RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

a hilly landscape with falling streams

6 0

3 years ago

What was the major issue of the newly formed republican party?

Ket [755]

The major issue was that it had no central government and the economy was broke.

8 0

4 years ago

Some students study hard beginning with the first couple of weeks of a semester because they subsequently receive very good fina

Studentka2010 [4]

The correct answer is letter D

Delayed reinforcement is a time delay between the desired response and the reward in the Operant Conditioning.

Operant conditioning (sometimes referred to as instrumental conditioning) is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Through operant conditioning, an association is made between a behavior and a consequence for that behavior.

6 0

4 years ago

Attacking Fraud" Think about a company where you have worked that had a case of employee theft or fraud. (If you do not know of

const2013 [10]

Answer:

I can share one fraud example that happened at a company I used to work at, perhaps it can help you with this.

I worked in recruiting for a medium sized tech company, and when big projects came along we had to hire a large number of people in a very short time. On one of these projects we hired a software developer to freelance for us in this project. He did such a good job that he was offered a permanent position after the project was done. He accepted and started working for us immediately after, as another manager wanted to work with him on another project.

Because he was known in the company and it was urgent that he worked with us, the hiring process was rushed and some steps were overlooked. One of these steps was asking the applicant to document their experience, we usually asked for references and recommendation letters. After about a month and a half, HR asked the developer to give his references or ask for recommendation letters, almost as a formality.

Although we called the references and they checked out, something was off in the statements they gave. So a colleague who knew people at a previous company this developer worked for, called a friend and asked her to inquire about him. Turns out he never worked there and had given a fake reference who he had instructed on what to say. Needless to say he was immediately fired.

Although there were policies and procedures to avoid an incident like this, work overload made it so that they were overlooked and we trusted that because he had been a good freelancer he would be a good employee. Afterwards, by company policy it was strictly forbidden to skip a step in the hiring process and a background check was also implemented.

3 0

4 years ago