Answer:
The correct answer is <em>c. "The National Breast Cancer Foundation in 2004 stated..."</em>
Explanation:
In order to honor the source of information and not falling into the risk of plagiarism, it is important to cite sources both in writing and in oral presentation, like speech.
For proper <u>oral citation</u> it is necessary to state the name of the author or, in this case, institution <em>(The National Breast Cancer Foundation)</em> and the date of publication <em>(2004)</em>. If the source also has a title or other authors credentials, they should be mentioned in the speech as well.
Answer:
a. Legal Services
Explanation:
Hi! The orientation of Louisa will be related to Legal Services. By being interested in the judicial issue, she can study to be a lawyer, and the profile of that profession is characterized by being very orderly, serious and thoughtful people, reflecting it in their workplace.
Thanks for your question!
Answer: Washington was not in favor of political parties. He wanted it to be about the best candidatewinning rather than it being about two parties preventing all other parties from having a chance atbeing elected.Washington felt that political parties would be the down fall of our country. Hewrote a letter to the nation warning the people of the danger of political parties, and how theywould turn the government from a group of people interested in their nation's future to a powerhungry professional politicians
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as a person for this purpose. Its effect was to give the southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally, thus allowing the slaveholder interests to largely dominate the government of the United States until 1861. The compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman.