1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frosja888 [35]
2 years ago
11

For a moment assume that descartes’ argument works in proving god’s existence, does the ultimate conclusion follow as stated in

premise 6? can descartes be certain that god would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity? maybe god has a reason, or needs to teach humanity a lesson.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mkey [24]2 years ago
7 0
Descartes cannot be certain that God would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity. But he believes that God is a more sensible being and formal compared to all of us that he created. He believes that God has a reason for everything because he knows everything. 
You might be interested in
What do consumers and businesses in a market economy seek to do?
olya-2409 [2.1K]
Businesses<span> want to make money or sell products, and </span>consumers<span> want to spend money, invest, or buy products.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
list the strengths of the constitution that were considered a weakness of the articles of confederation
enyata [817]

the picture attached has some details in which the Article of Confederate failed to  accomplished -- or so the weakness of the Article of Confederate.


Hope this helps out! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement about the population of New York City at each census from 1910 to 2010 is true?
sergeinik [125]
Yea because i searched it up on google and its very true i found like 30 pages saying its true       :D
5 0
3 years ago
How much time passed between the arrival of early humans and viking settlement on Newfoundland
Effectus [21]

about 40 thousand years

4 0
3 years ago
Ward is attempting to introduce oral evidence in an action relating to a written contract between Ward and Weaver. Weaver has pl
Julli [10]

Answer:

A change in the meaning of an unambiguous provision in the contract

Explanation:

The main aim of the pleading the parol evidence rule is to ensure that a party is prevented from any introduction of evidence of oral agreements made before the contract was agreed or in the process of reducing the agreement to its final form for the purpose of altering the existing terms in the current contract. Hence Weaver pleading the parol evidence rule ensures that Ward does not introduce parol evidence as long as it relates to a change in any of the provisions in the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When LED televisions started becoming popular in the city of Jazetta, all the electronic stores in the city stopped selling CRT
    12·1 answer
  • Describe how rock could form in layers
    10·2 answers
  • What are two reason that the us government encouraged the destruction of bisons?
    13·2 answers
  • When parking headed downhill it is best to:__________
    11·1 answer
  • who opposed the loaning of money at interest? a.the catholic church b.king edward c.king john d.commoners
    11·2 answers
  • What are detention and correctional facilities? how are they different?
    11·2 answers
  • NEED INFO ABOUT THOMAS JEFFERSON PLEASE
    12·2 answers
  • 6.
    14·2 answers
  • Nepal is a beautibed garden'. present you logics for call 8 ​
    6·1 answer
  • What ethnic group became dominant in the Eastern Europe
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!