1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frosja888 [35]
2 years ago
11

For a moment assume that descartes’ argument works in proving god’s existence, does the ultimate conclusion follow as stated in

premise 6? can descartes be certain that god would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity? maybe god has a reason, or needs to teach humanity a lesson.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mkey [24]2 years ago
7 0
Descartes cannot be certain that God would not allow an evil demon or computer to systematically deceive humanity. But he believes that God is a more sensible being and formal compared to all of us that he created. He believes that God has a reason for everything because he knows everything. 
You might be interested in
What is the term for powers not directly stated in the constitution but are necessary to carry out functions that are directly s
adelina 88 [10]

Implied powers are those that the "necessary and proper" language in Article I, Section 8 implies but which are not expressly defined in the constitution.

To enact all laws necessary and appropriate for carrying out the aforementioned powers, as well as all other powers granted to the United States government or any department or officer thereof by this constitution. The Necessary and Proper Clause1 closes up Article I's list of the enumerated powers of Congress by broadly stating that those powers also include the right to employ all appropriate measures to carry out those specified authorities. According to the Necessary and Proper Clause, all Implied and incidental powers that are helpful to the exercise of an enumerated power are included in the congressional power. The history of the Necessary and Proper Clause's insertion in the Constitution and its significance during the ratification discussions are first covered in this section. The section then moves on to early judicial interpretations of the Clause, culminating in Chief Justice John Marshall's famous McCulloch v. Maryland ruling from 1819. The section finishes with a discussion of contemporary Supreme Court opinions on the reach of Congress's jurisdiction under the Implied and Proper Clause, following a brief overview of the significant nineteenth-century Supreme Court decisions on the Clause after McCulloch.

Learn more about Implied and Constitution here:

brainly.com/question/29440625

#SPJ4

8 0
8 months ago
As a response to his son’s request to be driven to his friend’s place, William replies, "I know you want to go to your friend’s
forsale [732]

Answer: effect or consequence

Explanation:There are three part that makes up an assertive message it's the behaviour,feeling and the effect.

Teh behaviour is explained that William want to go and visit over his friend probably because he wants to relax and his father states his own feelings towards this.

The father thought doesn't state what will be the effect for William if he goes over to his friend which is will be probably more influential in changing his mind about going over to his friend .

The lack of the consequences on the message may make the receiver not see why his behaviour need to change or why he may need to rethink it.

4 0
2 years ago
Kenneth is a new salesperson in a firm. He collects all relevant data about his prospects, including their needs, buying behavio
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

analysis paralysis              

Explanation:

Analysis paralysis: The term "analysis paralysis" is also referred as "paralysis by analysis" and is described as a process in which an individual or a group of people tends to overthink or overanalyze a particular situation that can cause or leads to "forward motion" or the decision-making process becomes 'paralyzed' i.e, no course of action or solution is being decided upon.

In the question above, Kenneth is most likely experiencing the phenomenon known as 'analysis paralysis'.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement is correct? A) The 8 in 80 is 10 times greater than the 8 in 80. B) The 8 in 80 is 10 times less than the 8 in 8
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

the 8 in 80 is 10 times greater than the 8 in 80

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
How many people have stepped on the moon ?
kvv77 [185]
Umm is this like a school question or a normal question I mean you can just search it up
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone falls into the water from a dock. what is the first thing you should do to help this person?
    15·1 answer
  • Which Gospel emphasizes the sacrificial death of Jesus as one who gives his life as a ransom for many?
    8·1 answer
  • Chance is a traveling marketing representative for a publishing company. He is an independent contractor. One afternoon while dr
    11·1 answer
  • When did Prithvi Narayan Shah get victory over makwanpur​
    13·2 answers
  • The country of ______ is located north of New England. Canada England Mexico
    15·1 answer
  • Why were treaties so important to the us?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me. I don’t want to do it. It can be about you. It’s okay. I will give you a lot of points please please I beg you t
    13·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo explicas la contradicción existente, en que según Estados Unidos es un pueblo
    13·1 answer
  • "competent communication requires that individuals" . A. be true to themselves and respond in ways they feel are appropriate B.
    10·1 answer
  • An unusually small hippocampus may be one factor in the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. A small hippocampus is the
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!