The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer:
(a) $210,000
(b) $351,500
Explanation:
(a) Given that,
Fair value of equipment = $1,440,000
Face Amount of the note = $1,230,000
Gain on sale:
= Fair value of equipment - Face Amount of the note
= $1,440,000 - $1,230,000
= $210,000
(b) Given that,
Accrued Interest Payable = $290,000
Interest rate = 5%
Gain on the partial settlement and restructure of the debt:
= Accrued Interest Payable + (Face amount of note × Interest rate)
= $290,000 + ($1,230,000 × 5%)
= $290,000 + $61,500
= $351,500
Given that the planned sales for June this year are $120,000 and that last year's actual sales for the month of June were $110,000, there is a 9.09% increase in sales for the month.
The actual increase in sales is $10,000 ($120,000 - $110,000) or ($110,000 x 1.0909 - $110,000)
Data and Calculations:
Planned sales for June, this year = $120,000
Actual sales for June,last year = $110,000
Planned percent increase in sales for June = 9.09% ($10,000/$110,000 x 100)
Thus, the planned percentage increase in sales for the month is 9.09%.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/17194869
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Option of whether Pine street Inc. should sell unfinished book cases
Sales per unit
$59
Less:
Variable cost per unit
$37
Contribution per unit
$22
Less:
Fixed cost
$10
Operating profit
$10.
Option of whether Pine street inc. should sell finished book cases
Sales per unit
$75
Less :
Variable cost per unit
$8
Contribution per unit
$67
Less :
Fixed cost
$10
Operating profit
$57
Therefore, it is recommended that Pine street inc. should sell finished book cases because that would yield the highest operating profit.
Answer:
2009 $11,000
2010 $19,250
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what Depreciation expense in 2009 and 2010 will be:
2009 depreciation expense=$88,000 × 2/8
2009 depreciation expense = $22,000/2
2009 depreciation expense = $11,000
2010 depreciation expense= $77,000 × 2/8 2010 depreciation expense=$19,250
Therefore the Depreciation expense in 2009 and 2010 will be:
2009 $11,000
2010 $19,250
