1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nalin [4]
3 years ago
5

Antonyms: Match the word with the word or phrase most nearly its opposite. 18.   (5 pt) capricious   A. foreign   B. rebellious

  C. thoughtful   D. miserable
English
2 answers:
leva [86]3 years ago
5 0
Capricious means sudden and unaccountable mood changes. 

Foreign means not local, so that's not it. 
Rebellious means disobedient, so that's not it. 
Thoughtful means considerate, and steady. So this is probably it.
Miserable means extremely sad, so that's not it. 

The correct answer is C. Thoughtful. 

Hope this helped! Please comment or DM me if you have anymore questions or don't understand. :)
Sonbull [250]3 years ago
5 0
The right answer is c
You might be interested in
How was the Olmec stone discovered?
Otrada [13]

Explanation:

It is one of the finest examples of an Olmec colossal head. It was found lying on its side to the south of a monumental throne. The monument was discovered at a depth of 5 metres (16 ft) during a magnetometer survey of the site in 1968; it has been dated to the Early Preclassic.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were political pamphlets published without the author's name?
blsea [12.9K]
The answer is B. the author could be found as a traitor because of the nature of the content. Political pamphlets often dealt with issues and topics that went against the current government. As such, anyone who disagrees and possibly incites rebellion would be viewed as a traitor and therefore would publish anonymously to keep their head.
8 0
3 years ago
What was Gerald Graff’s main argument in the article?
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Historian of the profession and of the profession’s arguments, influential commentator and spirited critic of the educational practices that havedefined literature and composition classrooms, forceful advocate for the profession in the public sphere—Gerald Graff stands as the profession’s indomitable and indispensable Arguer-in-Chief. In his books Literature against Itself, Professing Literature, Beyond the Culture Wars, and Clueless in Academe, Graff invites all parties—students, teachers, scholars, citizens—to gather where the intellectual action is, to join the fray of arguments that connect books to life and give studies in the humanities educational force.

    Chicago born and educated in Chicago’s public schools and at the University of Chicago and Stanford University, he became John C. Shaffer Professor of English and Humanities and chair of the English department at Northwestern University, then George M. Pullman Distinguished Service Professor of English and Education at the University of Chicago, then associate dean and professor of English and education at the University of Illinois, Chicago. A founder of Teachers for a Democratic Culture, a president of the Modern Language Association, a presence in Chicago-area high schools, a speaker at over two hundred colleges and universities, Graff has taken our profession to task for the gap between academic culture and the students and citizens of our nation. Critic from the City of the Big Shoulders, he has argued compellingly that the strength of our profession resides in the plurality of its voices and the potential of its classrooms to reveal sprawling, brawling democratic vistas.

Francis March Award for Distinguished Service to the Profession of English, Modern Language Association of America, January 2011

   

Graff’s major influence on education, particularly on the classroom practice of teachers, is reflected today in the Common Core State Standards for K-12 schools:

the Standards put particular emphasis on students’ ability to write sound arguments on substantive topics and issues, as this ability is critical to college and career       readiness. English and education professor Gerald Graff writes that “argument literacy” is fundamental to being educated. The university is largely an “argument culture,” Graff contends; therefore, K–12 schools should “teach the conflicts” so that students are adept at understanding and engaging in argument (both oral and written) when they enter college. . . .            —Appendix, “The Special Place of Argument in the Standards”

Graff’s argument that schools and colleges should respond to curricular and cultural conflicts by “teaching the conflicts” themselves is developed in such books as Professing Literature (1987; reprinted in a 20th Anniversary edition in 2007), which is widely regarded as a definitive history, and Beyond the Culture Wars (1992).   His idea also inspired a series of “Critical Controversies” textbooks which Graff co-edited with James Phelan.

In Clueless in Academe (2003) Graff analyzed (in the book’s subtitle) “how schooling obscures the life of the mind,” and argued that schools and colleges need to demystify academic intellectual culture for all students, not just the high achieving few.  This book led Graff and his wife Cathy Birkenstein to publish a writing textbook, They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (2006), which continues to set records for adoptions by colleges and high schools.  Graff (and now Graff and Birkenstein) has given hundreds of invited lectures and workshops, and his work has been the topic of three special sessions at MLA conferences and part of a special issue of the journal Pedagogy.  Graff served as the President of MLA in 2008.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Rachels claims that Theological Voluntarism makes morality mysterious. What does he mean by this?
maxonik [38]

Answer:

It is difficult to discern whether individuals can be designated as having good morals when an action is done not because it was moral, but because God has commanded it.

Explanation:

The idea of Theological Volunteerism is that an action has moral value because the action is approved or even recommended by God, through his teachings. In this context, what we as humans might consider as something that is morally right, may be considered in opposition to God's will or even deemed as irrelevant since it was not taught by God of certain religions as a morally right action that their follower should take.

A great example of this would be the idea of slaughtering some farm animals under the name of God for it to be consumed by the followers of the religion, even though it means that the method used to kill these animals is more inhumane. To the followers of the religion, this action is morally right since God has commanded it to be so; to those who aren't followers of the religion, it is a horrific and morally wrong action.  

5 0
3 years ago
BRAINIEST TO THE BEST ANSWER
muminat

Answer:

the below words have been taken from the picture

nouns

countryside

man

woman

tree

forested area

verbs

sitting

standing

talking

giggling

cleaning

chopping trees

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Correct answer gets brainliest! :) Help is highly appreciated.
    5·2 answers
  • Man vs.self explanation
    9·1 answer
  • Eckels, the main character in a sound of thunder
    8·1 answer
  • Read this sentence from a report on Oscar Wilde.
    14·2 answers
  • What kinds of teacher did Margie and Tommy have. Describe about it​
    8·2 answers
  • A rainy day will go away.
    13·2 answers
  • "Towards thee I roll thou all destroying but conquering whale to the last I grapple with thee; from hell's heart I stab at thee;
    5·2 answers
  • I will give brainlest
    6·2 answers
  • Which passage from the story is an allusion to a famous Sonnet by William Shakespeare? a. A face that launched a thousand ships
    5·1 answer
  • In the United States, we can vore and will be able to sign contracts legally at the age of 18 we can vote and then sign contract
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!