Answer:
International investment has become more one-sided, consisting almost entirely of foreign direct investment.
Explanation:
This is because now internationally opportunities are being seized to have a better return on investment , to invest where opportunity cost is better and scope of foreign direct investment includes purchase of assets and shares.
Simple returns focus on accounting for net operating income, not cash flow. The simple method of revenue focuses on cash flow rather than accounting for net operating income.
A simple rate of return is calculated by subtracting the initial value of the investment from the current value and dividing it by the initial value. To output as%, multiply the result by 100.
Under the simple rate of return method, a dollar you receive 10 years later is considered to be worth the $ 1 you receive today. Therefore, the simple yield method can be misleading if the alternative cash flow patterns under consideration are different.
Learn more about cash flows at
brainly.com/question/735261
#SPJ4
<em>Your question is incomplete. please read below to find the full content.</em>
The Simple Rate Of Return Focuses On Accounting Net Operating Income Rather Than On Cash Flows.
A) TRUE
B) FALSE
Answer:
Marketing
Explanation:
There are various explanations for the term Marketing. It is essentially a group of activities aimed at creating a valuable customer relationship. Unlike traditional approaches which planned their activities based on what the customers would buy, the Marketing approach takes decisions based on wht the customer wants/needs. It places customer at the center and all the activities revolve around them.
Answer:A merger
Explanation:
This is coming of two companies to form a new firm with both companies losing their indentity .
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
