The conclusion, is at the end of a research process because you are wrapping up your thoughts into one paragraph. Also, you are paraphrasing what you said in the introduction.
Answer:
An attribution is <u>the way where by we link up behavior of a person to the cause of that behavior.</u> .The type of attribution based on personal characteristics is called a <u>INTERNA</u><u>L</u> attribution while an attribution based on the situation is called an <u>EXTERNAL</u> attribution.
Explanation:
Attribution has to do with the inferences individuals make about a particular behavior and the causes. Making attributions enable one to have more meaning about the experience that has occurred.
INTERNAL ATTRIBUTION: is the type of attribution that is based on whether the individual behavior is as a result of the personal factors of the person. Such factors can include traits, personality or effort.
EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION: that the behavior of a person is as result of external factors that are foreign to the individual who perform the act.
In the case Marbury v. Madison the supreme court first exercised the power of judicial review
The United States Supreme Court is the Supreme Court of Federal Jurisdiction in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court actions and state court actions, including points of federal law.
Nine judges make up the current Supreme Court. The Honorable John G. Roberts Jr. is the 17th Chief Justice of the United States and has 104 deputy judges in his court history.
As the final court of justice, charged with assuring the American people the promise of equal justice under the law, the courts also serve as protectors and interpreters of the Constitution.
Learn more about the supreme court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
