Under what circumstances would a defendant be wise to settle out of court? Explain.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Cloud [144]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

It might be best to settle out of court if the parties do not have the means to wait for the full resolution from the courts or if the plaintiff is likely to win and the defendant wants to keep the details more private.

Explanation:

It would be wise for a defendant to settle out of court when the trial will be lengthy and they may not have the means to wait for a long settlement and drawn out procedure. If the injured party feels the terms of the settlement are favorable to them and they are satisfied with what is being offered, it might be in their best interest to accept as well. This also helps to keep the terms about the negotiation and deal struck more private than a trial and hearing might. If the defendant is a company for example they might want to keep information about the grievance against them private.

You might be interested in

Directions: Explain how each of the following economic systems answer the 3 Basic Questions:

Natalija [7]

Answer:

help me tooooo

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

The "elastic clause" in the U.S. Constitution. What is it?

Lunna [17]

The "Elastic Clause," or "Necessary and Proper Clause," is a section of Article One of the Constitution that provides Congress with the ability to establish laws beyond those defined by the Constitution. The clause allows the legislative branch to expand its powers if their action is deemed "necessary and proper."

7 0

3 years ago

What is the meaning of life

IrinaK [193]

Answer:

Pertains to significance of living or existence in general.

5 0

3 years ago

Within 48 hours, people tend to forget approximately ________ percent of what was said in a 10-minute conversation.

Mashutka [201]

Within 48 hours, people tend to forget approximately 50 percent of what was said in a 10-minute conversation.
?

8 0