Answer:
Maine tiene la mayor cantidad de árboles en todos los estados
Explanation:
lo siento, no hablo inglés, así que estoy usando google :)
Tener una gran noche!
Almost certainly yes. Historians believe that one of the greatest causes of World War II was the incredibly ruthless Treaty of Versailles after World War I, which forced Germany to pay huge reparations, thus making them bitter and desperate.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
Volcanic Eruption should be the correct answer
The content of the Northwest Ordinance has set a precedent for everyone. The Northwest Ordinance set several important precedents. Unlike many who left the new territories from inferior positions.
A precedent definition is a decision that provides a basis or reason for a future decision. An example of precedent is the Brown v. Board of Education decision defining future anti-racism laws.
A precedent is something that precedes or precedes. The Supreme Court relies on precedent, a previous law or decision that serves as a few examples or rules that can guide if they actually decide. Case law promotes judicial restraint and limits a judge's ability to determine the outcome of a case in a way that judges may choose in the absence of precedent. The function of this precedent gives it moral strength. Use cases also improve efficiency.
Learn more about precedent here:brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ9
