The want of natural resourse sometimes resulted in colflict because sometimes there wouldn't be much to trade and it was needed greatly so it would result in more of a desperate time for resources. Trade was one of the first bridges between New England colonists and local Native American populations. ... The Native Americans provided skins, hides, food, knowledge, and other crucial materials and supplies, while the settlers traded beads and other types of currency (also known as “wampum”) in exchange for these goods.
Hope that helped
Answer:
1. Inca empire - Developed in modern-day Peru in South America in the 13th century and lasted until the Spanish conquests in the 1500s.
2. Codices -Books created by the Mayans and Aztecs.
3. Aztec civilization - Civilization that dominated many areas of Central America from the 1300s to the 1500s, when the Spanish arrived.
4 Glyphs -Represent words and syllables in the Mayan language.
5 Effigy mounds - Man-made mounds of earth often created in the shapes of animals.
Geoglyphs - Large designs that are created on the ground with objects like stones, trees, gravel, or other durable landscape elements.
Hope this helps have a nice day!
Historian Frederick Merk says this concept was born out of "a sense of mission to redeem the Old World by high example ... generated by the potentialities of a new earth for building a new heaven".[4]
Historians have emphasized that "manifest destiny" was a contested concept—pre-civil war Democrats endorsed the idea but many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs) rejected it. Historian Daniel Walker Howe writes, "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity ... Whigs saw America's moral mission as one of democratic example rather than one of conquest."[5]
Newspaper editor John O'Sullivan is generally credited with coining the term manifest destiny in 1845 to describe the essence of this mindset, which was a rhetorical tone;[6] however, the unsigned editorial titled "Annexation" in which it first appeared was arguably written by journalist and annexation advocate Jane Cazneau.[7] The term was used by Democrats in the 1840s to justify the war with Mexico and it was also used to divide half of Oregon with the United Kingdom. But manifest destiny always limped along because of its internal limitations and the issue of slavery, says Merk. It never became a national priority. By 1843 John Quincy Adams, originally a major supporter of the concept underlying manifest destiny, had changed his mind and repudiated expansionism because it meant the expansion of slavery in Texas.
