Answer:
A. the economy is producing at less than its potential output and has some cyclical unemployment.
Explanation:
Increase in government spending will increase domestic income, only if economy is producing at less than its potential output.
Increase in federal government spending raises the level of 'govt expenditure' in Aggregate Demand. This creates 'Excess Demand' (AD > AS). However, if the economy is at full employment level, i.e all the resources are already best efficiently utilised as per their production potential. Then, the economy can't increase its domestic income more than its full employment (full potential) level. So : Increase in government spending in full employment case, wont increase total production/ income/ employment further ; as the economy is already at full employment & can't increase economic activity beyond that.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a)
Investment in bonds Dr A/c$120000
Interest receivable Dr A/c$ 1000
To Cash A/c $121000
(purchased of 5% bonds with accrued interest of $1000 on the bonds for cash is recorded)
b)
Cash Dr. A/c $3000 ($120,000 × 5% × 6 months ÷ 12 months)
To Interest receivable A/c $1000
To Interest Revenue A/c $2000
(Being the first semiannual interest payment is received)
c) Cash Dr A/c $61100 ($60,000 × 101 + $500)
To Investment in bonds $60000
To Interest Revenue $ 500
To Gain in sale of investment $600
( Being the sale of bond with accrued interest of $500 is recorded and the remaining amount will be credited to the gain in sale of investment)
Answer:
$16 increase on income
Explanation:
Cost of purchase - $125
Direct materials - $ 38
Direct labor - $ $50
Overhead - $ 75
Incremental variable cost -$21
Relevant cost = $(38 + 50 +21)= $109
Cost saved = $(125-109) = $16
It is cheaper to manufacture than buying.
Good Afternoon,
YMCA is the place for signing up kids so that people will take care of them while your gone or even after school. Therefore, A is the answer :)
Hope I helped, and good luck studying :D
Thank you,
Darian D.