You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
I hope this picture helps. I'll elaborate if needed!
Answer:
1. C-surface area
2. The formula V = B x h is not suitable, because the surface area of wrapping paper needed to be calculated, not the volume.
V = Ph + 2B = 15x(5+6+9) + 2x 9x3/2 = 327
3. B: Base area
H: Height of solid
4. She said V =220, while V_real = 7x6x4 =168
=> She is wrong
5. Check the Pythagorean theorem 3^2+4^2 =9+16 =25 =5^2
=> Right triangle.
=> Area = 3x4/2 =6
Answer:
280.8
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 100% is the full amount, and it is 35% off you add 35 to the 100. So you get 1.35. You finally multiply by 207 and get 280.8
