Answer:
$1,032.01
Explanation:
Given:
Face value of bond (FV) = $1,000
Coupon rate = 6% annual rate or 6% / 2 = 3% semi-annual rate
Coupon payment (pmt) = 0.03 × $1,000
= $30
Rate = 5.5% annually or 5.5 / 2 = 2.75%
Time period (nper) = 8 × 2 = 16 periods
Current value of bond is present value of bond which can be computed using spreadsheet function =PV(rate,nper,pmt,FV)
So, present value of bond is $1,032.01.
PV is negative as it's cash outflow.
Answer:
Applied Overhead is higher than actual overhead. Hence, manufacturing overhead is $ 4,000
Explanation:
Given data:
estimated overhead = $2,40,000
Labor cost =$2,80,000
Direct labor cost = $3,00,000

= $ 0.80 per direct labor cost
=$ 2,24,000
Actual Overhead cost = $ 2,20,000
Applied Overhead is more than actual overhead. Hence, manufacturing overhead is $ 4,000.
The answer is: averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
When we use principle of aggregation, we would not rely on single measurement to make a representation of a person's behavior. We rely more on multiple sets of measurements.
From the case above, Sheridan not attending the services for two weeks could be explained by things such as personal issues or physical illness. Since she considers herself as religious who attend regularly, it is very likely that averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
<span>Nutrition Labeling and Education Act
This act requires nutrition labeling on food and standardizes terms such as serving size, "low fat", "light", and the such. It prevents things such as claiming "low calorie" cause the "calories per serving" is only half of the competitors, while specifying an absurdly low serving size that's also half the size the competitors use.</span>
Answer:
The payment made by Cordelia
Explanation:
In the scenario it stated clearly that Rupert filled out what would have been a normal application form for operational license in the country
However Cordelia using connections was able to schedule a meeting with the government official that <u>has the authority to determine which foreign companies get licenses, and pays him $200 to approve their license.</u>
Cordelia payment is nothing short of bribery and corruption because it is not a legally required payment and the motive was clearly to unduly influence the minister to approve their license.
Such payment will likely violate the foreign corrupt practices act