Answer:
<em>c. The reasoning of both Alfons and Mary suffers from the omitted variable problem</em>
Explanation:
The issue of omitted variables occurs as a result of mis-specification of a linear regression model, which could be either because the impact of the omitted variable on both the dependent variable is unclear, or the evidence was not accessible.
This causes you to omit the variable from your regression, resulting in over-estimation (upward bias) or underestimation (downward) of the influence of one of the other predictor variables.
<span>a contractionary fiscal policy that will shift the aggregate demand curve to the left by an amount equal to the initial change in investment times the spending multiplier.</span>
Answer: $3360
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the amount of cash paid by SH to Oakley will be calculated as thus:
SH will be entitled to a discount of 4% since the payment was made within the discount period, therefore, the discount that is applicable will be:
= $4500 - $1000
= $3,500
Therefore, the amount of cash payment that is made by SH to Oakley will be:
= $3,500 - (4% × $3,500)
= $3500 - (0.04 × $3500)
= $3500 - $140
= $3360
Therefore, the amount of cash paid by SH to Oakley is $3360.
The rate of photosynthesis would be slowed down, the rapid heat increase would put the plant into a sort of shock, slowing down the cells activities and then the plant would eventually die
Do you have a question about it?