The other "righteous cause" that participants in the Seneca Falls Convention would have most likely supported is <em>C. Abolitionism.</em>
According to history, the five women who championed the Convention in July 1848 at <em>Seneca Falls in New York</em> were authoritative supporters of Abolition.
<em>Elizabeth Stanton's </em><em>Seneca Falls Convention</em><em> </em>sought to establish the unalienable rights of women in line with the <em>"Declaration of Independence." </em> The Convention, with its own <em>"Declaration of Sentiments," </em>marked the first women's rights convention in the US.
Thus, the Seneca Falls Convention established the women's suffrage movement, laying the foundation for the 19th Amendment, and righteously sought to end slavery.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/20086324
Answer:
D) participating in such experiments causes people to develop an enduring distrust of researchers.
Explanation:
Research found out that participating in deception experiments causes people to develop an enduring distrust of researchers.
The reason is that when people feel deceived, they tend to lose trust. In psychology, deception is considered one of the moral issues that consists of misleading someone into thinking opposite to what reality actually is. A human mind would automatically create doubt and mistrust as a result of such activities.
Hello there!
I believe the answer would be false.
Sadly, many inmates and prior offenders are released from jail with no supervision whatsoever. Many get out of jail, and continue doing wrong again.
Hope this helps you!
~Lex
It is called jury nullification when the jury ignores the law and acquits an obviously guilty defendant.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The jury is a subordinate body of citizens that assists the judge in his decisions or give a decision that is different from the decision of the judge. This body of citizens, in certain cases, has the power that allows them to exercise jury nullification.
And, declare an obviously guilty accused as not guilty based on the personal conviction of the jury members and their own persuasion of the matter.
