Answer:
Yes, by exerting her force further from the gate hinges than her father does.
Explanation:
Torque is a concept that was originated by Archimedes when they were using levers. It is a turning effect or a linear equivalent rotational force used in physics. It is a pseudo vector. The term Torque was given by James Thomson in 1884. It is a different pronunciation or word vocabulary in different geographical regions. This term is used in physics and its uses in physics.
It is
t =r *F
Where r is position vector and F is force acting and T is torque
Answer:
Answer is adequacy [ nutritional adequacy]
Explanation:
Adequate or sufficient consumption of essential nutrients which is required in fulfilling nutritional requirements is known to be adequacy [ nutritional ].
The mean adequacy ratio [MAR] can be calculated as follows
MAR = sum of NAR/ number of nutrients × 100.
Note; NAR is Nutrients adequacy ratio.
Answer:
The implications of Radical Skepticism for knowledge and for the rest of life is described below in details.
Explanation:
Radical skepticism is the thoughtful condition that experience is most likely unattainable. Radical skeptics believe that uncertainty endures as to the truthfulness of every faith and that assurance is therefore never explained. The cause for this is that accurately represented, radical skepticism is expected to be nonsense, in that it presents deep anxiety in our epistemological theories.
Presidential electors were chosen to represent the interests of states. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "c". The Presidential electors will have to first get selected from their states before they can go for the selection of the president and the vice president. As they represent their states, so they normally represent the interest of their states.
Answer:
The answer is C. It could not explain higher-level cognitive processes.
Explanation:
One of the main reasons why the behaviorist perspective lost its appeal and other perspectives, such as humanism, gained more strenght, is that, by explaining human behavior only in terms of responses to a stimulus, it failed to explain higher-level cognitive processes. It didn't provide the theoretical tools to analyze behavior that was not motivated by a stimulus or a reward or behavior that took place even after knowing that their would be a punishment.
