All categories

3 years ago

Was John Brown justified in his violence in the name of abolition? Why or why not?

History

1 answer:

jeka943 years ago

7 0

Answer:

John Brown was not justified in his violence in the name of abolition.

Explanation:

The reason for this is that it was murder. It was amazing that he had such strong beliefs but terrorist have strong beliefs. They kill to get their point across however it is MURDER. Innocent lives and families where destroyed because of his ignorance and need to prove a point. John Brown could have taken different actions instead he killed people. This was not justified no matter his situation of slavery.

Brown was courageous and brave but certainly not honorable. Instead he was a coward because he brutally murdered people who disagreed with him and his point of views.

You might be interested in

In the 19th century, what were the two patterns of intergroup relations native americans were subjected to by the dominant white

Vlad [161]

They were put on reservations

5 0

3 years ago

Which principle of the government ensured that executive power was limited by the judicial branch

dem82 [27]

Answer:

The legislative branch makes laws, but the President in the executive branch can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto.

The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.

The executive branch, through the Federal agencies, has responsibility for day-to-day enforcement and administration of Federal laws. These Federal departments and agencies have missions and responsibilities that vary widely, from environmental protection to protecting the Nation’s borders.

The President in the executive branch can veto a law, but the legislative branch can override that veto with enough votes.

The legislative branch has the power to approve Presidential nominations, control the budget, and can impeach the President and remove him or her from office.

The executive branch can declare Executive Orders, which are like proclamations that carry the force of law, but the judicial branch can declare those acts unconstitutional.

The judicial branch interprets laws, but the President nominates Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges who make the evaluations.

The judicial branch interprets laws, but the Senate in the legislative branch confirms the President’s nominations for judicial positions, and Congress can impeach any of those judges and remove them from office.

4 0

3 years ago

The workers in industrial countries must create a

Vitek1552 [10]

It was Karl Marx who said that the workers in industrial countries must create a
<span>revolution, overthrow the existing governments using force if necessary, and then create a new classless society.</span>

4 0

4 years ago

1.Analyze Effects Which trait aids in building a sense of loyalty to the ruler? 2.Draw Conclusions How can intensive agriculture

frez [133]

Answer:

1. Nobility, love for the country and no love for power.

2. Feed the population and also causes pollution.

Explanation:

Traits such as nobility, love for the country and no love for power aids in building a sense of loyalty to the ruler because these features are the parts of loyalty. Intensive agriculture be both a strength and a weakness because it feeds the population as well as earn money by selling in the market while it also some weakness such as polluted the environment and overcrowding of the livestock.

6 0

3 years ago

Give me two examples on European life of the effects on monarchs and the church

ss7ja [257]

Answer/Explanation:

Church gradually became a defining institution of the Roman Empire. Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in 313 proclaiming toleration for the Christian religion, and convoked the First Council of Nicaea in 325 whose Nicene Creed included belief in "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church". Emperor Theodosius I made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonian of 380.

After the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century, there emerged no single powerful secular government in the West. There was however a central ecclesiastical power in Rome, the Catholic Church. In this power vacuum, the Church rose to become the dominant power in the West. The Church started expanding in the beginning 10th century, and as secular kingdoms gained power at the same time, there naturally arose the conditions for a power struggle between Church and Kingdom over ultimate authority.

In essence, the earliest vision of Christendom was a vision of a Christian theocracy, a government founded upon and upholding Christian values, whose institutions are spread through and over with Christian doctrine. In this period, members of the Christian clergy wield political authority. The specific relationship between the political leaders and the clergy varied but, in theory, the national and political divisions were at times subsumed under the leadership of the Catholic Church as an institution. This model of Church–State relations was accepted by various Church leaders and political leaders in European history.

The classical heritage flourished throughout the Middle Ages in both the Byzantine Greek East and the Latin West. In the Greek philosopher Plato's ideal state there are three major classes, which was representative of the idea of the "tripartite soul", which is expressive of three functions or capacities of the human soul: "reason", "the spirited element", and "appetites" (or "passions"). Will Durant made a convincing case that certain prominent features of Plato's ideal community were discernible in the organization, dogma and effectiveness of "the" Medieval Church in Europe.

4 0

3 years ago