Was John Brown justified in his violence in the name of abolition? Why or why not?

History

1 answer:

jeka943 years ago

7 0

Answer:

John Brown was not justified in his violence in the name of abolition.

Explanation:

The reason for this is that it was murder. It was amazing that he had such strong beliefs but terrorist have strong beliefs. They kill to get their point across however it is MURDER. Innocent lives and families where destroyed because of his ignorance and need to prove a point. John Brown could have taken different actions instead he killed people. This was not justified no matter his situation of slavery.

Brown was courageous and brave but certainly not honorable. Instead he was a coward because he brutally murdered people who disagreed with him and his point of views.

You might be interested in

I should look at reliable and trustworthy sources when solving problems

DedPeter [7]

Yes,you should.

123456

6 0

3 years ago

What's an impact of automation?

spin [16.1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Describe the four areas of progressive reform

tia_tia [17]

Social/Economic justice.
Environment
National Security (end war on terror)
Health care (universal)

4 0

3 years ago

Why did the u.s. department of labor encourage the employment of women in the 1950s?

BlackZzzverrR [31]

<span>The U.S. had many women employed at the end of the 1940's due to World War II and as the troops returned from overseas, not all were able to return to the workforce which encouraged women to continue in the labor market at that time. This trend was encouraged through the 1950's to ensure a robust workforce at home as many men were either fighting in the Korean war or unable to return to the workforce still after World War II.</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Here's the second picture, first one you couldn't see

shepuryov [24]

Answer: I still think C but possibly D but C makes sense since the picture shows a man being attacked by snakes

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago