1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
3 years ago
11

Was John Brown justified in his violence in the name of abolition? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
jeka943 years ago
7 0

Answer:

John Brown was not justified in his violence in the name of abolition.

Explanation:

The reason for this is that it was murder. It was amazing that he had such strong beliefs but terrorist have strong beliefs. They kill to get their point across however it is MURDER. Innocent lives and families where destroyed because of his ignorance and need to prove a point. John Brown could have taken different actions instead he killed people. This was not justified no matter his situation of slavery.

Brown was courageous and brave but certainly not honorable. Instead he was a coward because he brutally murdered people who disagreed with him and his point of views.

You might be interested in
How is Cleopatra NOT described in the passage
GREYUIT [131]
Could I have more details about the paragraph????
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the civil war ?
MAXImum [283]
From what I can remember, states' rights was a large factor contributing to the Civil War. With Lincoln becoming president and representing the North, the Southern states seceded, leading to a war. The state governments of the South argued that since the Constitution and the federal government was created by the states, the federal government had no right to stop states from seceding. President Lincoln and other northerners disagreed and wanted to preserve the Union by stopping states from seceding.
After the war, I believe the South still disagreed on a strong federal government. They wanted to rule the area by themselves.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Homework! PLEASE HELP!!
levacccp [35]

Answer:

D.forigen countries refusing to buy american goods.

Explanation:

Gogle is my explanation

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
30 POINTS!!! Write a paragraph comparing the changes in government after the American and French
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Similarity--both the US and France went through periods of adjustment on their way to a permanent government.

Difference--the US was able to create a democratic government and make changes from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution without a complete revolution and extreme violence. France on the other hand established a tyrannical government and then a dictatorship under the rule of Napoleon. It took more time and stages for France to find a democratic balance they were hoping for.  

4 0
3 years ago
How did the results of the French and Indian war impact Britain economically
Artyom0805 [142]

The French and Indian War impacted the colonies economically. As a result of the war, the British were able to expand their influence in the Ohio Valley. This meant the British would profit even more from the lucrative fur trade now that France had left the area.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did america originally want to remain neutral??
    6·1 answer
  • What were the immediate results of the japan/china evasion in 1937?
    11·1 answer
  • f Cuba were to enter into a trade agreement with an Asian country in 1903 without US approval, which of the following would be v
    15·1 answer
  • What were three significant meanings of charlemagne being crowned “emperor of the romans?”?
    11·1 answer
  • the union realized it would need to accomplish two goals in order to defeat the confederacy. what were these goals
    7·1 answer
  • All of the following helped to stimulate the hysteria known as mccarthyism except one. which is the exception? russia's successf
    9·1 answer
  • What was president taffs official attitude towards trust
    13·1 answer
  • The Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931, Mussolini’s attack on Ethiopia in 1935, and Hitler’s rebuilding of the German milita
    13·1 answer
  • Question 18 of 24
    6·1 answer
  • The Reformation of England was both a Choose...
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!