Is this statement true or false?

History

2 answers:

Aleks04 [339]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

the first one Congress passed the Slavery Act, which allowed blacks to own slaves in an attempt to give blacks the rights of full citizenship. is false

the second one Ratifying the 14th amendment guaranteeing individual rights, was one way the government attempted to give blacks the right of full citizenship. is ture

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1. False

2. True

Explanation:

Owning slaves is not a right of a U.S. citizen and no such act ever existed or was passed.

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States" and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” This was primarily intended to establish civil and legal rights for emancipated slaves and black Americans.

You might be interested in

¿Porque y como se relacionan los fenómenos de la materia y la energía?

AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

no se ask my friend

Explanation: no se lol

3 0

3 years ago

Which country had the most powerful navy in the sixteenths century

Goshia [24]

Answer:

ENGLAND

Explanation:

Because the middle of the 16th century, Spain had created an American empire.

5 0

3 years ago

The Republican Party began as a series of anti-slavery political meetings held in the Midwest in 1854. True False

Harrizon [31]

<span>This is true. The republican party is the one that fought for a change and supported the end of slavery. The democrat party supported slavery and eventually the civil war came and the slavery era ended under president Lincoln who was a Republican until his assassination in 1865.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

What impact did enlightenment ideas have on the french revolution?

Alecsey [184]

It was less death by gilotine for sure. It brought out imperialism as well

7 0

3 years ago

How do political parties serve georgians and u.s. citizens?

Lera25 [3.4K]

They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.

6 0

3 years ago