Answer:
For A. and B see attached files
Explanation:
Managers are responsible for helping the business achieve goals.
If the economy's income rises, the price of a normal good like a trumpet will rise and the quantity will increases.
If the number of trumpet producers on the market increases, this means that there will be an increase in supply, which can mean greater availability of these goods and, consequently, a reduction in price.
In a situation where there are few substitutes for trumpets, demand will be relatively inelastic, as consumers are not as sensitive to price changes due to low availability.
<h3 /><h3>What is the law of supply and demand?</h3>
They are economic concepts related to the quantity of a good available in the market and its price, which are determined by the law of supply and demand, impacted by economic forces, such as income, producers, and policies for example.
Therefore, the greater the supply than the demand, the lower the prices, and the lower the supply, the higher the prices.
Find out more about supply and demand here:
brainly.com/question/1222851
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to this question is
b. people with a desire for a beverage other than soda or water
Explanation:
The "second" party needed for marketing to occur in this case are people who are in need of the product produced by Dr. Pepper Snapple Group. (I.e the customers ) however, the type of customer that Dr. Pepper Snapple group will seek to have are customer with a desire for a beverage other than soda and water because it's price is comparable to that of soft drink. Which implies that customer with no interest in that kind of product will not buy but will rather stick with their preference for soft drinks since it is the same price with the new product by Dr. Pepper Snapple group.
Hence, Dr. Pepper Snapple group will need to have people with a desire for a beverage other than soda or water for marketing to occur.
Answer:
Option E is correct.
All of the above
Explanation:
This is an example of political risk since The current political party in Maharashtra-Shiv sena intervened and used Enron for its selfish interests. When US department of energy issued a statement that cancelling Enron could endanger other private FDI from USA, the same was again used to further its selfish interests. Finally Maharashtra renegotiated its contract with Enron.
