This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:
Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)
We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.
Answer:
Explanation:
C Owners of sole proprietorship cannot be sued for their company's wrongdoing.
Answer:
92 year old
Explanation:
because i use subtraction to get to get the answee
According to research, no statistical relationship type of statistical relationship exists between continuance commitment and citizenship behavior
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
no statistical relationship?</h3>
Generally, If there is a change in one variable (X), and that change causes another variable to rise in a predictable way, then there is a statistical link between the two variables (Y).
It is not required that the systematic growth be accurate (that is, up by 10 units each time), but it should be nearly the same ("around ten").
In conclusion, According to the findings of the study, there is no statistical association of any kind between continuing commitment and civic behavior.
Read more about no statistical relationship
brainly.com/question/15708496
#SPJ1
C. The accused does not have to prove his or her innocence.