If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
The answers are conscientiousness, agreeableness,
neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion. Researchers who used the
factor analysis method agreed that the mentioned traits are considered to be
core traits of an individual’s personality. Some of these traits are hard to
practice, which is why an individual must be open to experience different things
in order for them to cope up with his or her environment.
Answer:
Why did you delete my previous answer?
Explanation:
Obedience to authority would be considered abnormal conduct if you were the king or queen of your realm.
<h3>What does Stanley Milgram's experiment in this regard explain?</h3>
The key themes of Stanley Milgram's well-known obedience experiment are social control and social conformity. Conformity is one result of other people's beliefs, feelings, and behaviors influencing us. Obedience to authority is another way for society to influence you. The act of changing one's behavior in order to accede to a request made by a higher authority is known as obedience.
<h3>What goal did the Milgram Experiment want to achieve?</h3>
Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to find out what people would choose to do when forced to choose between deferring to authority and following their morality and conscience.
<h3>What was the main topic of Milgram's experiment?</h3>
An experiment by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram examined the tension that exists between following orders and following one's conscience. He looked at the defenses put up by individuals indicted in the World War II Nuremberg War Criminal trials for committing acts of genocide.
Learn more about Milgram's experiment: brainly.com/question/19328289
#SPJ4
Answer:
My best guess would be (D)
Explanation:
I dont know for sure but I passed the test and answered that one so give it a shot
