This saying critiques the religion like an oxymoron. From one hand, it is something beneficial when it comforts afflicted ones. From other hand, it can be seen as poisoning like brainwashing and manipulating which means afflicting the comfortable. Although people have become more critical towards religion, religion still is an option in our modern lives.
According to Stewart et al. (2013), there is no universally accepted definition of response generalization, and many definitions take into account physical resemblance across stimuli, which is not necessarily true of language's generativity. In general, it is more of an explanatory fiction and doesn't demonstrate the generativity of language. According to Stewart et al., derived relational response is a far wiser option.
The capacity for both producing and comprehending previously unspoken statements is referred to as language generativity. Response generalization is one process that is frequently mentioned as underpinning linguistic generativity. Due to generativity in language we can make infinite number of messages
Learn more about generativity of language here
brainly.com/question/20921887
#SPJ4
Amendments can be proposed in Congress when 2/3rd<span> of both Houses agree. The states can play a role in proposing changes to the Constitution as well: 2/3</span>rds<span> of the state legislatures must call Conventions to propose amendments. Whether amendments are first proposed by the states or Congress, 3/4</span>ths<span> of the states must ratify (or approve) them before they become a part of the Constitution—the Supreme law of the land.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is C. provision for due process
