The rights of the owner to the subsurface of a piece of land would have little value if the owner could not use the surface to e

Question

creativ13 [48]

4 years ago

10

The rights of the owner to the subsurface of a piece of land would have little value if the owner could not use the surface to e

xercise those rights. True or False

Social Studies

1 answer:

Crazy boy [7] · Answer 1 · 2021-12-15T06:57:15+03:00

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Property ownership is peculiar in e sense that the owner acquires several different forms of land-related rights along with access to the surface of land and spaces above and below it. Surface rights refer to the rights of land usages, improvement, and sale. That implies the owner has the right to build, develop on, and otherwise use the surface of their land.